Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics ›› 2024, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 43-54.doi: 10.23919/JSEE.2023.000147
• RADAR DETECTION AND INTERFERENCE SUPPRESSION • Previous Articles
Tao JIAN1,*(
), Jia HE1(), Bencai WANG2(), Yu LIU1(), Congan XU1(), Zikeng XIE1()
Received:2022-05-16
Accepted:2023-10-26
Online:2024-02-18
Published:2024-03-05
Contact:
Tao JIAN
E-mail:work_jt@163.com;1191804968@qq.com;springbook7559@126.com;liuyu77360132@126.com;xcatougao@163.com;1397850644@qq.com
About author:Supported by:Tao JIAN, Jia HE, Bencai WANG, Yu LIU, Congan XU, Zikeng XIE. Adaptive detection of range-spread targets in homogeneous and partially homogeneous clutter plus subspace interference[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 35(1): 43-54.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
Table 1
Target energy distribution of h0 range cells for different MDS models"
| Model number | Range cell number | |||
| 1 | 2 | ··· | h0 | |
| Model 1 | 1/h0 | 1/h0 | ··· | 1/h0 |
| Model 2 | 0.5 | 0.5/(h0−1) | ··· | 0.5/(h0−1) |
| Model 3 | 0.9 | 0.1/(h0−1) | ··· | 0.1/(h0−1) |
| Model 4 | 1 | 0 | ··· | 0 |
Fig 1
Pfa versus threshold of S-Gradient in HE or PHE for N=8, K=15, R=16, p=3, q=2, ρ=0,0.1,0.5,0.9, h0=3, ICR=15 dB, γ=1,2"
Fig 2
Pd versus SCR of 2S-Gradient tests in HE and PHE with Model 1?Model 4 for N=8, K=15, R=16, p=3, q=2, Pfa=10?3, ρ=0.9, h0=3, γ=2, ICR=15 dB"
Fig 3
Pd versus SCR of 2S-Gradient tests in HE and PHE for N=8, K=15, R=16, p=3, q=2, Pfa=10?3, h0=3,7,10,12, ρ=0.9, γ=2, ICR=15 dB"
Fig 4
Pd versus SCR of 2S-Gradient tests in HE and PHE for N=8, K=15, R=16, p=2,3,4,5, q=2, Pfa=10?3, h0=3, ρ=0.9, γ=2, ICR=15 dB"
Fig 5
Pd versus SCR of 2S-Gradient tests in HE and PHE for N=8, K=15, R=16, p=3, q=2, Pfa=10?3, h0=3, ρ=0.9, γ=2, ICR=5, 10 ,15, 20 dB"
Fig 6
Pd versus SCR of 2S-Gradient tests in HE and PHE for N=8, K=15, R=16, p=3, q=2, Pfa=10?3, h0=3, ρ=0, 0.1, 0.5, 0.9, γ=2, ICR=15 dB"
Fig 7
Pd versus SCR of 2S-Gradient tests in HE and PHE for N=6,8,10, K=15, R=12,16,20, p=3, q=2, Pfa=10?3, h0=3, ρ=0.9, γ=2, ICR=15 dB"
Fig 8
Pd versus SCR of 2S-Gradient tests in HE and PHE for N=8, K=15, R=16, p=3, q=2,3,4,5, Pfa=10?3, h0=3, ρ=0.9, γ=2, ICR=15 dB"
Fig 9
Pd versus SCR of different detectors in HE for N=8, K=15, R=24, p=3, q=2, Pfa=10?3, h0=3, ρ=0.9, ICR=15 dB"
Fig 10
Pd versus SCR' of different detectors in HE for N=8, K=15, R=16, p=3, q=2, Pfa=10?3, h0=3, ρ=0.9, ICR=15 dB, cos2?=0.3"
Fig 11
Pd versus cos2? of different detectors in HE for N=8, K=15, R=16, p=3, q=2, Pfa=10?3, h0=3, ρ=0.9, ICR=15 dB, SCR'=11 dB"
Fig 12
MESA plots of constant detection probability in HE for N=8, K=15, R=16, p=3, q=2, Pfa=10?3, h0=3, ρ=0.9, ICR=15 dB"
Fig 13
Pd versus SCR of different detectors in PHE for N=8, K=15, R=24, p=3, q=2, Pfa=10?3, h0=3, ρ=0.9, γ=2, ICR=15 dB"
Fig 14
Pd versus SCR' of different detectors in PHE for N=8, K=15, R=16, p=3, q=2, Pfa=10?3, h0=3, ρ=0.9, γ=2, ICR=15 dB, cos2?=0.3"
Fig 15
Pd versus cos2? of different detectors in PHE for N=8, K=15, R=16, p=3, q=2, Pfa=10?3, h0=3, ρ=0.9, γ=2, ICR=15 dB, SCR'=13 dB"
Fig 16
Mesa plots of constant detection probability in PHE for N=8, K=15, R=16, p=3, q=2, Pfa=10?3, h0=3, ρ=0.9, γ=2, ICR=15 dB"
| 1 | JIAN T, HE Y, WANG H P, et al Persymmetric generalised adaptive matched filter for range-spread targets in homogeneous environment. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, 2019, 13 (8): 1234- 1241. |
| 2 |
LIU W J, LIU J, HAO C P, et al Multichannel adaptive signal detection: basic theory and literature review. Science China Information Sciences, 2022, 65 (2): 121301.
doi: 10.1007/s11432-020-3211-8 |
| 3 | HAO C P, ORLANDO D, MA X, et al Adaptive detection of distributed targets with orthogonal rejection. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, 2012, 6 (6): 483- 493. |
| 4 |
JIAN T, HE Y, SU F, et al Robust detector for range-spread targets in non-Gaussian background. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2012, 23 (3): 355- 363.
doi: 10.1109/JSEE.2012.00044 |
| 5 |
XU S W, SHUI P L Performance analysis of multi-channel order statistics detector for range-spread target. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2012, 23 (5): 689- 699.
doi: 10.1109/JSEE.2012.00085 |
| 6 | GUO X L, TAO H H, ZHAO H Y, et al Persymmetric Rao and Wald tests for adaptive detection of distributed targets in compound-Gaussian noise. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, 2017, 11 (3): 453- 458. |
| 7 |
LIU W J, XIE W C, LIU J, et al Adaptive double subspace signal detection in Gaussian background—Part I: homogeneous environments. IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing, 2014, 62 (9): 2345- 2357.
doi: 10.1109/TSP.2014.2309556 |
| 8 |
DE MAIO A, IOMMELLI S Coincidence of the Rao test, Wald test, and GLRT in partially homogeneous environment. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2008, 15, 385- 388.
doi: 10.1109/LSP.2008.920016 |
| 9 |
LIU J, JIAN T, LIU W J Persymmetric detection of subspace signals based on multiple observations in the presence of subspace interference. Signal Processing, 2021, 183, 107964.
doi: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2021.107964 |
| 10 |
ORLANDO D, RICCI G A Rao test with enhanced selectivity properties in homogeneous scenarios. IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing, 2010, 58 (10): 5385- 5390.
doi: 10.1109/TSP.2010.2053032 |
| 11 |
SHUAI X F, KONG L J, YANG J Y Adaptive detection for distributed targets in Gaussian noise with Rao and Wald tests. Science China Information Sciences, 2012, 55 (6): 1290- 1300.
doi: 10.1007/s11432-011-4417-2 |
| 12 |
HAO C P, MA X C, SHANG X Q, et al Adaptive detection of distributed targets in partially homogeneous environment with Rao and Wald tests. Signal Processing, 2012, 92 (4): 926- 930.
doi: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2011.10.005 |
| 13 |
WANG Z Y, LI M, CHEN H M, et al Persymmetric detectors of distributed targets in partially homogeneous disturbance. Signal Processing, 2016, 128, 382- 388.
doi: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2016.05.010 |
| 14 |
FOGLIA G, HAO C P, FARINA A, et al Adaptive detection of point-like targets in partially homogeneous clutter with symmetric spectrum. IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2017, 53 (4): 2110- 2119.
doi: 10.1109/TAES.2017.2680758 |
| 15 |
GAO Y C, MAO L L, ZHU S Q, et al Subspace detection for range-spread target to suppress interference: exploiting persymmetry in non-homogeneous scenario. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 33 (1): 60- 71.
doi: 10.23919/JSEE.2022.000007 |
| 16 |
GAO Y C, LIAO G S, LIU W J High-resolution radar detection in interference and nonhomogeneous noise. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2016, 23 (10): 1359- 1363.
doi: 10.1109/LSP.2016.2597738 |
| 17 |
MAO L L, GAO Y C, YAN S F, et al Persymmetric subspace detection in structured interference and non-homogeneous disturbance. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2019, 26 (6): 928- 932.
doi: 10.1109/LSP.2019.2913332 |
| 18 |
DONG Y L, LIU M, LI K, et al Adaptive direction detection in deterministic interference and partially homogeneous noise. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2017, 24 (5): 599- 603.
doi: 10.1109/LSP.2017.2683198 |
| 19 | GAO Y C, LIAO G S, LIU W J, et al Bayesian generalised likelihood ratio tests for distributed target detection in interference and noise. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, 2017, 11 (5): 752- 758. |
| 20 |
BANDIERA F, DE MAIO A, GRECO A S Adaptive radar detection of distributed targets in homogeneous and partially homogeneous noise plus subspace interference. IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing, 2007, 55 (4): 1223- 1237.
doi: 10.1109/TSP.2006.888065 |
| 21 |
LIU W J, LIU J, HUANG L Rao tests for distributed target detection in interference and noise. Signal Processing, 2015, 117, 333- 342.
doi: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2015.06.012 |
| 22 |
LIU W J, LIU J, LI H, et al Multichannel signal detection based on Wald test in subspace interference and Gaussian noise. IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2019, 55 (3): 1370- 1381.
doi: 10.1109/TAES.2018.2870445 |
| 23 |
TANG P Q, DONG R, LIU W J Adaptive multichannel detectors for distributed target based on gradient test. Signal Processing, 2022, 191, 108350.
doi: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2021.108350 |
| 24 |
LIU J, LI J Mismatched signal rejection performance of the persymmetric GLRT detector. IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing, 2019, 67 (6): 1610- 1619.
doi: 10.1109/TSP.2019.2893858 |
| 25 |
SUN S Y, LIU J, LIU W J, et al Robust detection of distributed targets based on Rao test and Wald test. Signal Processing, 2021, 180, 107801.
doi: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2020.107801 |
| 26 |
COLUCCIA A, FASCISTA A, RICCI G A novel approach to robust radar detection of range-spread targets. Signal Processing, 2020, 166, 107223.
doi: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2019.07.016 |
| 27 | JIAN T, HE J, LIU Y, et al. Persymmetric adaptive detection of range-spread targets in subspace interference plus Gaussian clutter. Science China Information Sciences, 2023, 66(5): 152306. |
| 28 |
LIU J, LIU W J, CHEN X, et al Performance analysis of the generalized likelihood ratio test in general phased array radar configuration. IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing, 2021, 69, 4544- 4555.
doi: 10.1109/TSP.2021.3097658 |
| 29 |
LIU J, SUN S Y, LIU W J One-step persymmetric GLRT for subspace signals. IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing, 2019, 67 (14): 3639- 3648.
doi: 10.1109/TSP.2019.2918994 |
| 30 |
LIU J, MASSARO D, ORLANDO D, et al Radar adaptive detection architectures for heterogeneous environments. IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing, 2020, 68, 4307- 4319.
doi: 10.1109/TSP.2020.3009836 |
| 31 |
SUN M R, LIU W J, LIU J, et al Complex parameter Rao, Wald, Gradient, and Durbin tests for multichannel signal detection. IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing, 2022, 70, 117- 131.
doi: 10.1109/TSP.2021.3132485 |
| 32 |
JIAN T, HE Y, SU F, et al Adaptive detection of range-spread targets without secondary data in multichannel autoregressive process. Digital Signal Processing, 2013, 23 (5): 1686- 1694.
doi: 10.1016/j.dsp.2013.05.013 |
| 33 |
CONTE E, DE MAIO A, RICCI G GLRT-based adaptive detection algorithms for range-spread targets. IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing, 2001, 49 (7): 1336- 1348.
doi: 10.1109/78.928688 |
| [1] | Yongchan GAO, Linlin MAO, Shengqi ZHU, Lei ZUO. Subspace detection for range-spread target to suppress interference: exploiting persymmetry in non-homogeneous scenario [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 33(1): 60-71. |
| [2] | Xu Cheng, Longfei Shi, Yuliang Chang, Yongzhen Li, and Xuesong Wang. Novel polarimetric detector for target detection in heterogeneous clutter [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2016, 27(6): 1135-1141. |
| [3] | Weijian Liu, Wenchong Xie, Haibo Tong, Honglin Wang, Cui Zhou, and Yongliang Wang. Adaptive coherence estimator based on the Krylov subspace technique for airborne radar [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2015, 26(4): 705-. |
| [4] | Yang Li, Zhenyuan Ji, Bingfei Li, and Gil Alterovitz. Switching variability index based multiple strategy CFAR detector [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2014, 25(4): 580-. |
| [5] | Yinan Zhao, Fengcong Li, and Xiaolin Qiao. Knowledge-based adaptive polarimetric detection in heterogeneous clutter [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2014, 25(3): 434-442. |
| [6] | Weijian Liu, Wenchong Xie, and Yongliang Wang. Adaptive detection based on orthogonal partition of the primary and secondary data [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2014, 25(1): 34-42. |
| [7] | Yi Cui, Jian Yang, and Xinzheng Zhang. New CFAR target detector for SAR images based on kernel density estimation and mean square error distance [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2012, 23(1): 40-46. |
| [8] | Tao Jian, You He, Feng Su, Changwen Qu, and Dianfa Ping. High resolution radar target adaptive detector and#br# performance assessment [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2011, 22(2): 212-218. |
| [9] |
Gan Rongbing & Wang Jianguo.
Distribution-based CFAR detectors in SAR images
|
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
