Three-dimensional cooperative guidance law for multiple missiles with impact angle constraint

doi:10.23919/JSEE.2020.000099

Abstract

Abstract:

This paper proposes a cooperative guidance law for attacking a ground target with the impact angle constraint based on the motion camouflage strategy in the line-of-sight (LOS) frame. A dynamic model with the impact angle constraint is established according to the relative motion between multiple missiles and the target. The process of cooperative guidance law design is divided into two stages. Firstly, based on the undirected graph theory, a new finite-time consensus protocol on the LOS direction is derived to guarantee relative distances reach consensus. And the value of acceleration command is positive, which is beneficial for engineering realization. Secondly, the acceleration command on the normal direction of the LOS is designed based on motion camouflage and finite-time convergence, which can ensure the missiles reach the target with the desired angle and satisfy the motion camouflage state. The finite-time stability analysis is proved by the Lyapunov theory. Numerical simulations for stationary and maneuver targets have demonstrated the effectiveness of the cooperative guidance law proposed.

Key words: cooperative guidance law, motion camouflage, impact angle constraint, finite-time

Biao YANG, Wuxing JING, Changsheng GAO. Three-dimensional cooperative guidance law for multiple missiles with impact angle constraint[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 31(6): 1286-1296.

Figures/Tables 13

Fig 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

Table 1

Fig 5

Fig 7

Table 2

Fig 6

Fig 8

Fig 10

Table 3

Fig 9

References 29

1	ZHAO J B, YANG S X Review of multi-missile cooperative guidance. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2017, 38 (1): 22- 34.
2	BALHANCE N, WEISS M, SHIMA T Cooperative guidance law for Intrasalvo tracking. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 2017, 40 (6): 1441- 1456.
3	ZHENG W T, FONOD R, SHIMA T Cooperative guidance law for target pair to lure two pursuers into collision. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 2018, 41 (8): 1687- 1699.
4	LYU S, ZHU Z H, TANG S, et al Hybrid cooperative guidance law for active aircraft defense against a guided missile. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 2018, 41 (2): 531- 537.
5	GARCIA E, CASBEER D W, FUCHS Z E, et al Cooperative missile guidance for active defense of air vehicles. IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2018, 54 (2): 706- 720.
6	DAUGHTERY E, QU Z. Optimal design of cooperative guidance law for simultaneous strike. Proc. of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2015: 988−993.
7	WANG L, YAO Y, HE F H, et al A novel cooperative mid-course guidance scheme for multiple intercepting missiles. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2017, 30 (3): 1140- 1153.
8	ZHAO J, ZHOU R Unified approach to cooperative guidance laws against stationary and maneuvering targets. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2015, 81 (4): 1635- 1647.
9	KANG S, WANG J N, LI G, et al Optimal cooperative guidance law for salvo attack: an MPC-based consensus perspective. IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2018, 54 (5): 2397- 2410.
10	GUO C, LIANG X G Cooperative guidance law for multiple near space interceptors with impact time control. International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences, 2014, 15 (3): 281- 292.
11	SONG J H, SONG S M, XU S L Three-dimensional cooperative guidance law for multiple missiles with finite-time convergence. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2017, 67, 193- 205.
12	ZHOU H, RAHMAN T, CHEN W C Impact angle and impact velocity constrained terminal guidance for stationary target. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 2015, 87 (5): 454- 464.
13	KIM H, KIM H J. Missile guidance law considering constraints on impact angle and terminal angle of attack. Proc. of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, 2015: 1−16.
14	HE S M, LIN D F, WANG J Continuous second-order sliding mode based impact angle guidance law. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2015, 41, 199- 208.
15	GOPALAN A, RATNOO A, GHOSE D Generalized time-optimal impact-angle-constrained interception of moving targets. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 2017, 40 (8): 2111- 2116.
16	WU Y A, ZHANG R, LI H F. Terminal guidance with impact angle constraint based on a practical flight strategy. Proc. of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, 2016: 289-294.
17	SHIM S W, HONG S M, MOON G H, et al Impact angle and time control guidance under field-of-view constraints and maneuver limits. International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences, 2018, 19 (1): 217- 226.
18	ZHANG Y, TANG S J, GUO J An adaptive fast fixed-time guidance law with an impact angle constraint for intercepting maneuvering targets. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2018, 31 (6): 1327- 1344.
19	WANG X L, ZHANG Y A, WU H L Distributed cooperative guidance of multiple anti-ship missiles with arbitrary impact angle constraint. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2015, 46, 299- 311.
20	WANG X H , YANG Q W. Cooperative guidance law design for salvo attacks with impact angle constraint. Proc. of the IEEE Chinese Automation Congress, 2017: 3241−3246.
21	SRINIVASAN M V, DAVEY M Strategies for active camouflage of motion. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 1995, 259 (1354): 19- 25.
22	MIZUTANI A, CHAHL J S, SRINIVASAN M V Insect behaviour: motion camouflage in dragonflies. Nature, 2003, 423 (6940): 604- 604.
23	BAKOLAS E, TSIOTRAS P Feedback navigation in an uncertain flow field and connections with pursuit strategies. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 2012, 35 (4): 1268- 1279.
24	JUSTH E W, KRISHNAPRASAD P S Steering laws for motion camouflage. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2006, 462 (2076): 3629- 3643.
25	GAO C S, LI J Q, JING W X Motion camouflage strategy guidance law for intercepting maneuvering target. Journal of Astronautics, 2016, 37 (6): 737- 743.
26	WANG H T, SHI D P Terminal guidance law for Scramjet missile with motion camouflage theory. Modern Defence Technology, 2018, 46 (2): 36- 42.
27	GAO C S, LI J Q, FENG T M, et al Adaptive terminal guidance law with impact-angle constraint. The Aeronautical Journal, 2017, 122 (1249): 369- 389.
28	LYU T, LYU Y Y, LI C J, et al Time-cooperative guidance law for multiple missiles with spatial cooperation. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39 (10): 190- 201.
29	WANG X H, WANG J Z Partial integrated missile guidance and control with finite time convergence. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 2013, 36 (5): 1399- 1409.

Missile	Position/km	Velocity/(m/s)	LOS angle/(°)	Desired angle/(°)
1	(103,6,0)	814	40.6	50
2	(105,8,0)	792	55.5	70
3	(104,7,2)	824	47.9	60
4	(104,6,?3)	824	39.3	55

Missile	Miss distance/m	Guidance time/s	Angle error/(°)
1	0.086	12.710	0.032
2	0.043	12.710	0.047
3	0.026	12.710	0.026
4	0.053	12.710	0.052

Missile	Miss distance/m	Guidance time/s	Angle error/(°)
1	0.056	13.591	0.052
2	0.037	13.591	0.047
3	0.042	13.591	0.025
4	0.063	13.591	0.103

[1]	Hang GUO, Zheng WANG, Bin FU, Kang CHEN, Wenxing FU, Jie YAN. Impact angle constrained fuzzy adaptive fault tolerant IGC method for Ski-to-Turn missiles with unsteady aerodynamics and multiple disturbances [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 33(5): 1210-1226.
[2]	Shengnan FU, Guanqun ZHOU, Qunli XIA. A trajectory shaping guidance law with field-of-view angle constraint and terminal limits [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 33(2): 426-437.
[3]	Wei LI, Qiuqiu WEN, Lei HE, Qunli XIA. Three-dimensional impact angle constrained distributed cooperative guidance law for anti-ship missiles [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 32(2): 447-459.
[4]	Enjiao ZHAO, Zenan ZHONG, Xin ZHENG. Finite-time control of formation system for multiple flight vehicles subject to actuator saturation [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 31(5): 1019-1030.
[5]	Wenjie ZHANG, Shengnan FU, Wei LI, Qunli XIA. An impact angle constraint integral sliding mode guidance law for maneuvering targets interception [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 31(1): 168-184.
[6]	Ping MA, Denghui ZHANG, Songyan WANG, Tao CHAO. Integrated guidance and control design method based on finite-time state observer [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 29(6): 1251-1262.
[7]	Jianguo GUO, Yuchao LIU, Jun ZHOU. Integral terminal sliding mode control for nonlinear systems [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 29(3): 571-579.
[8]	Ran LI, Qiuqiu WEN, Wangchun TAN, Yijie ZHANG. Adaptive weighting impact angle optimal guidance law considering seeker's FOV angle constraints [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 29(1): 142-151.
[9]	Li Yuan, Guangfu Ma, Chuanjiang Li, and Boyan Jiang. Finite-time attitude tracking control for spacecraft without angular velocity measurements#br# [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 28(6): 1174-1185.
[10]	Ri Liu, Xiuxia Sun, Wenhan Dong, and Dong Wang. Finite-time adaptive sliding mode control for heavyweight airdrop operations [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 28(2): 338-346.
[11]	Zhanshan Zhao, Hongru Gu, Jing Zhang, and Gang Ding. Terminal sliding mode control based on super-twisting algorithm [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 28(1): 145-.
[12]	Chutiphon Pukdeboon. Adaptive backstepping finite-time sliding mode control of spacecraft attitude tracking [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2015, 26(4): 826-.
[13]	Ran Li, Qunli Xia, and Qiuqiu Wen. Extended optimal guidance law with impact angle and acceleration constriants [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2014, 25(5): 868-876.
[14]	Yong Guo, Shenmin Song, and Liwei Deng. Finite-time coordination control for formation flying spacecraft [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2014, 25(5): 859-867.
[15]	Ying Yang1,2,?,Junmin Li1,and Guopei Chen2. Finite-time stability and stabilization of Markovian switching stochastic systems with impulsive effects [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2010, 21(2): 254-260.