Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics ›› 2018, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 587-600.doi: 10.21629/JSEE.2018.03.16
• Control Theory and Application • Previous Articles Next Articles
Jin ZHOU1,*(
), Lei SHAO1(), Huaji WANG1(), Dayuan ZHANG2(), Humin LEI1()
Received:2017-05-26
Online:2018-06-28
Published:2018-07-02
Contact:
Jin ZHOU
E-mail:zhoujindr@yahoo.com;shaoleijin@163.com;whj20081744@163.com;dayuanyjs@163.com;hmleinet@21cn.com
About author:ZHOU Jin was born in 1989. He is a Ph.D. candidate in control theory and engineering at Air and Missile Defense College, Air Force Engineering University, Xi’an, China. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees from Air Force Engineering University in 2015 and 2012, respectively. His current research interests focus on the hypersonic interception, advanced guidance law design, and missile automatic controller design. E-mail: Supported by:Jin ZHOU, Lei SHAO, Huaji WANG, Dayuan ZHANG, Humin LEI. Optimal midcourse trajectory planning considering the capture region[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 29(3): 587-600.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
Fig 1
Engagement geometry"
Fig 2
Engagement geometry"
Fig 3
CR with $\mathit{\boldsymbol{N = 5}}$ and$\mathit{\boldsymbol{\rho = 2}}$ "
Fig 4
Midcourse trajectory planning considering CR"
Fig 5
Midcourse trajectory planning flow chart"
Fig 6
Curves of trajectory in scenario one"
Fig 7
Curves of velocity and flight path angle in scenario one"
Fig 8
Curves of dynamic pressure, heating transfer rate and overload in scenario one"
Fig 9
Curves of angle of attack in midcourse in scenario one"
Fig 10
Curves of acceleration command in terminal guidance in scenario one"
Fig 11
Curves of trajectory in scenario two"
Fig 12
Curves of acceleration command in terminal guidance in scenario two"
Fig 13
Curves of trajectory in case one of scenario three"
Fig 14
Curves of velocity and flight path angle in case one of scenario three"
Fig 15
Curves of dynamic pressure, heating transfer rate and overload in case one of scenario three"
Fig 16
Curves of angle of attack in midcourse in case one of scenario three"
Fig 17
Curves of acceleration command in terminal guidance in case one of scenario three"
Fig 18
Curves of trajectory in case two of scenario three"
Fig 19
Curves of velocity and flight path angle in case two of scenario three"
Fig 20
Curves of dynamic pressure, heating transfer rate and overload in case two of scenario three"
Fig 21
Curves of angle of attack in midcourse in case two of scenario three"
Fig 22
Curves of acceleration command in terminal guidance in case two of scenario three"
Fig 23
Curves of trajectory in case three of scenario three"
Fig 24
Curves of velocity and flight path angle in case three of scenario three"
Fig 25
Curves of dynamic pressure, heating transfer rate and overload in case three of scenario three"
Fig 26
Curves of angle of attack in midcourse in case three of scenario three"
Fig 27
Curves of acceleration command in terminal guidance in case three of scenario three"
Fig 28
Curves of trajectory in scenario four"
Fig 29
Curves of velocity and flight path angle in scenario four"
Fig 30
Curves of dynamic pressure, heating transfer rate and overload in scenario four"
Fig 31
Curves of angle of attack in midcourse in scenario four"
Fig 32
Curves of acceleration command in terminal guidance in scenario four"
Table 1
Time consumption s"
| Scenario one | Scenario two | Scenario three | Scenario four | ||
| 0.204 7 | 0.188 0 | 0.279 9 | 0.187 5 | 0.242 2 | 0.283 2 |
| 1 |
ZHOU J, LEI H, ZHANG D. Online optimal midcourse trajectory modification algorithm for hypersonic vehicle interceptions. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2017, 63, 266- 277.
doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2016.12.022 |
| 2 | WANG L, YAO Y, HE F, et al. A novel cooperative mid-course guidance scheme for multiple intercepting missiles. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2017, 30 (3): 1140- 1153. |
| 3 |
ZHAO J, ZHOU R. Distributed three-dimensional cooperative guidance via receding horizon control. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2016, 29 (4): 972- 983.
doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2016.06.011 |
| 4 |
YAKIMENKO O A, LUKACS J A. Trajectory-shaping guidance for interception of ballistic missiles during the boost phase. Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, 2008, 31 (5): 1524- 1531.
doi: 10.2514/1.32262 |
| 5 |
ZHUANG Y, MA G, HUANG H, et al. Real-time trajectory optimization of an underactuated rigid spacecraft using differential flatness. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2012, 23 (1): 132- 139.
doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2011.06.010 |
| 6 |
BORYGA M, GRABOS A. Planning of manipulator motion trajectory with higher-degree polynomials use. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2009, 44 (7): 1400- 1419.
doi: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2008.11.003 |
| 7 |
BOYARKO G, ROMANO M, YAKIMENKO O. Time-optimal reorientation of a spacecraft using an inverse dynamics optimization method. Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, 2011, 34 (4): 1197- 1208.
doi: 10.2514/1.49449 |
| 8 |
JAVIER G, MANUEL S, FRANCISCO J. Collocation methods to minimum-fuel trajectory problems with required time of arrival in ATM. Journal of Aerospace Information Systems, 2016, 13 (7): 243- 265.
doi: 10.2514/1.I010401 |
| 9 |
MAURO P, BRUCE A. Conway, particle swarm optimization applied to space trajectories. Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, 2010, 33 (5): 1429- 1441.
doi: 10.2514/1.48475 |
| 10 |
HUNTINGTON G T, RAO A V. Optimal reconfiguration of spacecraft formations using the gauss pseudospectral method. Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, 2008, 31 (3): 689- 698.
doi: 10.2514/1.31083 |
| 11 |
HOUACINE M, KHARDI S. Gauss pseudospectral method for less noise and fuel consumption from aircraft operations. Journal of Aircraft, 2010, 47 (6): 2152- 2159.
doi: 10.2514/1.C031007 |
| 12 |
ZHAO J, ZHOU R. Reentry trajectory optimization for hypersonic vehicle satisfying complex constraints. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2013, 26 (6): 1544- 1553.
doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2013.10.009 |
| 13 | YANG L, ZHOU H, CHEN W. Application of linear gauss pseudospectral method in model predictive control. Acta Astronautica, 2014, 96, 175- 187. |
| 14 |
PAUL W. Application of pseudospectral methods for receding horizon control. Journal of Guidance, 2004, 27 (2): 310- 314.
doi: 10.2514/1.5118 |
| 15 |
OZA H B, PADHI R. Impact-angle-constrained suboptimal model predictive static programming guidance of air-toground missiles. Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, 2012, 35 (1): 153- 164.
doi: 10.2514/1.53647 |
| 16 |
CHAWLA C, SARMAH P, PADHI R. Suboptimal midcourse guidance of interceptors for high speed targets with alignment angle constraint. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2010, 14 (6): 377- 386.
doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2010.04.001 |
| 17 | DUFLOS E, PENEL P, VANHEEGHE P. 3D guidance law modeling. IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 1999, 35(1): 72-83. |
| 18 | TYAN F. Unified approach to missile guidance laws: a 3D extension. IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2005, 41(4): 1178-1199. |
| 19 | TYAN F. Capture region of a GIPN guidance law for missile and target with bounded maneuverability. IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2011, 47(1): 201-213. |
| 20 |
TYAN F. Capture region of a 3D PPN guidance law for intercepting high-speed targets. Asian Journal of Control, 2012, 14 (5): 1215- 1226.
doi: 10.1002/asjc.396 |
| 21 |
LI K, CHEN L, BAI X. Differential geometric modeling of guidance problem for interceptors. Science China Technological Sciences, 2011, 54 (9): 2283- 2295.
doi: 10.1007/s11431-011-4451-8 |
| 22 |
LI K, ZHANG T, CHEN L. Ideal proportional navigation for exoatmospheric interception. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2013, 26 (4): 976- 985.
doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2013.06.007 |
| 23 |
LI K, CHEN L, TANG G. Improved differential geometric guidance commands for endoatmospheric interception of highspeed targets. Science China Technological Sciences, 2013, 56 (2): 518- 528.
doi: 10.1007/s11431-012-5087-z |
| 24 | BETTS J T. Practical methods for optimal control using nonlinear programming. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mechanics, 2001. |
| 25 | LEI H M, ZHOU J, ZHAI D L, et al. Midcourse optimal trajectory modification using the second variation. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2016, 38 (12): 2807- 2813. |
| [1] | Bin FU, Hang GUO, Kang CHEN, Wenxing FU, Xingyu WU, Jie YAN. Aero-thermal heating constrained midcourse guidance using state-constrained model predictive static programming method [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 29(6): 1263-1270. |
| [2] | Humin Lei, Jin Zhou, Dailiang Zhai, Lei Shao, and Dayuan Zhang. Optimal midcourse trajectory cluster generation and trajectory modification for hypersonic interceptions#br# [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 28(6): 1162-1173. |
| [3] | Jiang Zhao, Rui Zhou, and Xuelian Jin. Progress in reentry trajectory planning for hypersonic vehicle [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2014, 25(4): 627-. |
| [4] | Yu Zhang, Jing Chen, and Lincheng Shen. Hybrid hierarchical trajectory planning for a fixed-wing UCAV performing air-to-surface multi-target attack [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2012, 23(4): 536-552. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
