Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 1447-1464.doi: 10.23919/JSEE.2023.000115
收稿日期:
2022-08-30
出版日期:
2023-12-18
发布日期:
2023-12-29
Ruhao JIANG1,2(), He LUO1,2,3(), Yingying MA1,2(), Guoqiang WANG1,2,3,*()
Received:
2022-08-30
Online:
2023-12-18
Published:
2023-12-29
Contact:
Guoqiang WANG
E-mail:jiangrh@mail.hfut.edu.cn;luohe@hfut.edu.cn;mayingying@mail.hfut.edu.cn;gqwang2017@hfut.edu.cn
About author:
Supported by:
. [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 34(6): 1447-1464.
Ruhao JIANG, He LUO, Yingying MA, Guoqiang WANG. Multicriteria game approach to air-to-air combat tactical decisions for multiple UAVs[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 34(6): 1447-1464.
"
Variable | Description |
Our UAV formation | |
Foe UAV formation | |
The | |
The | |
A set of tactics for | |
A set of tactics for | |
The position and state of | |
The position and state of | |
The position and state sets of | |
The position and state sets of |
"
Partial binary relation | Description | Constraint condition |
"
Number | Set 1 | Set 2 | Set 3 | |||
1 | 4×4×8 | 0.6 | 16×16×8 | 0.6 | 8×12×8 | 0.7 |
2 | 8×8×8 | 0.7 | 16×16×10 | 0.7 | 8×16×8 | 0.7 |
3 | 12×12×8 | 0.7 | 16×16×12 | 0.8 | 12×18×8 | 0.7 |
4 | 16×16×8 | 0.7 | 16×16×14 | 0.8 | 12×24×8 | 0.7 |
5 | 20×20×8 | 0.7 | 16×16×16 | 0.8 | 16×24×8 | 0.7 |
6 | 24×24×8 | 0.7 | 16×16×18 | 0.8 | 16×32×8 | 0.7 |
7 | 28×28×8 | 0.7 | 16×16×20 | 0.8 | 20×30×8 | 0.7 |
8 | 32×32×8 | 0.7 | 16×16×22 | 0.9 | 20×40×8 | 0.7 |
9 | 36×36×8 | 0.7 | 16×16×24 | 0.9 | 24×36×8 | 0.7 |
10 | 40×40×8 | 0.7 | 16×16×26 | 0.9 | 24×48×8 | 0.7 |
11 | 50×50×8 | 0.7 | 16×16×30 | 1.0 | 30×60×8 | 0.7 |
12 | 60×60×8 | 0.7 | 16×16×40 | 1.0 | 40×70×8 | 0.7 |
13 | 70×70×8 | 0.7 | 16×16×60 | 1.0 | 50×80×8 | 0.7 |
14 | 80×80×8 | 0.7 | 16×16×80 | 1.0 | 60×100×8 | 0.6 |
15 | 100×100×8 | 0.7 | 16×16×100 | 1.0 | 70×120×8 | 0.6 |
"
R’tactics | B’tactics | ||
"
Tactic | ||
0.268969,0.281608,0.290261,0.455265) 0.268914,0.255821,0.246304,0.00378254) | 0.499388,0.499952,0.49992,0.499755) 0,0,0,0) | |
0.268969,0.282472,0.2271,0.473773) 0.268914,0.254891,0.30651,0.0000731) | 0.499388,0.499953,0.499891,0.499857) 0,0,0,0) |
1 | SUN Z X, PIAO H Y, YANG Z, et al Multi-agent hierarchical policy gradient for air combat tactics emergence via self-play. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2022, 98, 104112. |
2 | XU X M, YANG R N, FU Y Situation assessment for air combat based on novel semi-supervised naive Bayes. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 29 (4): 768- 779. |
3 | JIANG Y Y, GAO Y, SONG W Q, et al Bibliometric analysis of UAV swarms. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 33 (2): 406- 425. |
4 | JEREMY J, FREDERICK L, DENNIS E. Deployment and flight operations of a large scale UAS combat swarm: results from DARPA service academies swarm challenge. Proc. of the International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems, 2018: 12−15. |
5 |
JOAO P, MARCOS R, ANDRE N, et al Machine learning to improve situational awareness in beyond visual range air combat. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 2022, 20 (8): 2039- 2045.
doi: 10.1109/TLA.2022.9853232 |
6 |
YANG Z, SUN Z X, PIAO H Y, et al Online hierarchical recognition method for target tactical intention in beyond-visual-range air combat. Defence Technology, 2022, 18, 1349- 1361.
doi: 10.1016/j.dt.2022.02.001 |
7 |
SHIN H, LEE J, KIM H, et al An autonomous aerial combat framework for two-on-two engagements based on basic fighter maneuvers. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2018, 72, 305- 315.
doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2017.11.014 |
8 |
ISHWARYA M S, ASWANI K C Quantum-inspired ensemble approach to multi-attributed and multi-agent decision-making. Applied Soft Computing, 2021, 106, 107283.
doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107283 |
9 | ZHANG Q H, YANG C C, WANG G Y A sequential three-way decision model with intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: System, 2021, 51 (5): 2640- 2652. |
10 |
SELVACHANDRAN G, QUEK S, HAN L, et al A new design of mamdani complex fuzzy inference system for multiattribute decision making problems. IEEE Trans. on Fuzzy Systems, 2021, 29 (4): 716- 730.
doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2019.2961350 |
11 |
ALKAHER D, MOSHAIOV A Dynamic-escape-zone to avoid energy-bleeding coasting missile. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2015, 38 (10): 1908- 1921.
doi: 10.2514/1.G000776 |
12 | LI S Y, CHEN M, WU Q X, et al Threat sequencing of multiple UCAVs with incomplete information based on game theory. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 33 (4): 986- 996. |
13 |
ZHE Y A coalitional extension of generalized fuzzy games. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2020, 383, 68- 79.
doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2019.06.010 |
14 |
BACKWELL D An analog of the minimax theorem for vector payoffs. Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 1956, 6 (1): 1- 8.
doi: 10.2140/pjm.1956.6.1 |
15 |
RETTIEVA A Dynamic multicriteria games with asymmetric players. Journal of Global Optimization, 2022, 83 (3): 521- 537.
doi: 10.1007/s10898-020-00929-5 |
16 |
CLEMENTE M, FERNANDEZ F, PUERTO J Pareto-optimal security strategies in matrix games with fuzzy payoffs. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2011, 176 (1): 36- 45.
doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2011.03.006 |
17 |
FERNANDEZ F, MONROY L, PUERTO J Multicriteria goal games. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 1998, 99 (2): 403- 421.
doi: 10.1023/A:1021726311384 |
18 |
RADJEF M S, FAHEM K A note on ideal Nash equilibrium in multicriteria games. Applied Mathematics Letters, 2008, 21 (11): 1105- 1111.
doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2007.12.009 |
19 |
ZAPATA A, MARMOL A, MONROY L, et al A maxmin approach for the equilibria of vector-valued games. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2019, 28 (2): 415- 432.
doi: 10.1007/s10726-018-9608-4 |
20 |
QUANT M, BORM P, FIESTRAS-JANEIRO G On properness and protectiveness in two-person multicriteria games. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 2009, 140 (3): 499- 512.
doi: 10.1007/s10957-008-9464-5 |
21 |
FAHEM K, RADJEF M S Properly efficient Nash equilibrium in multicriteria noncooperative games. Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 2015, 82 (2): 175- 193.
doi: 10.1007/s00186-015-0508-y |
22 |
ZELENY M Games with multiple payoffs. International Journal of Game Theory, 1975, 4 (4): 179- 191.
doi: 10.1007/BF01769266 |
23 |
MARCO G, MORGAN J A refinement concept for equilibria in multicriteria games via stable scalarizations. International Game Theory Review, 2007, 9 (2): 169- 181.
doi: 10.1142/S0219198907001345 |
24 |
NOVIKOVA N M, POSPELOVA I I Scalarization method in multicriteria games. Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, 2018, 58 (2): 180- 189.
doi: 10.1134/S0965542518020112 |
25 |
COOK W D Zero-sum games with multiple goals. Naval Research Logistics, 1976, 23 (4): 615- 621.
doi: 10.1002/nav.3800230406 |
26 |
NISHIZAKI I, NOTSU T Nondominated equilibrium solutions of a multiobjective two-person nonzero-sum game and corresponding mathematical programming problem. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 2007, 135 (2): 217- 239.
doi: 10.1007/s10957-007-9245-6 |
27 |
HONG J M, KIM M H, LEE G M On linear vector program and vector matrix game equivalence. Optimization Letters, 2012, 6 (2): 231- 240.
doi: 10.1007/s11590-010-0237-3 |
28 |
CHANDRA S, AGGARWAL A On solving matrix games with pay-offs of triangular fuzzy numbers: certain observations and generalizations. European Journal of Operational Research, 2015, 246 (2): 575- 581.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.011 |
29 |
PENG H G, WANG X K, WANG T L, et al Multi-criteria game model based on the pairwise comparisons of strategies with Z-numbers. Applied Soft Computing, 2019, 74, 451- 465.
doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2018.10.026 |
30 |
ZYCHOWSKI A, GUPTA A, MANDZIUK J, et al Addressing expensive multi-objective games with postponed preference articulation via memetic co-evolution. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2018, 154, 17- 31.
doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2018.05.012 |
31 |
HAREL M, MOSHAIOV A, ALKAHER D Rationalizable strategies for the navigator–target–missile game. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2020, 43 (6): 1129- 1142.
doi: 10.2514/1.G004875 |
32 | YOUSFI-HALIMI N, RADJEF M S, SLIMANI H Refinement of pure Pareto Nash equilibria in finite multicriteria games using preference relations. Annals of Operations Research, 2018, 267 (1): 607- 628. |
33 |
HAMEL A H, LOHNE A A set optimization approach to zero-sum matrix games with multi-dimensional payoffs. Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 2018, 88 (3): 369- 397.
doi: 10.1007/s00186-018-0639-z |
34 | MA Y Y, WANG G Q, HU X X, et al Two-stage hybrid heuristic search algorithm for novel weapon target assignment problems. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2021, 162, 107717. |
35 |
YAO Z X, MING L, CHEN Z J, et al Mission decision-making method of multi-aircraft cooperatively attacking multi-target based on game theoretic framework. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2016, 29 (6): 1685- 1694.
doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2016.09.006 |
36 |
ZHAO K Y, LI L, CHEN Z Q, et al A survey: optimization and applications of evidence fusion algorithm based on Dempster-Shafer theory. Applied Soft Computing, 2022, 124, 109075.
doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109075 |
37 |
SU M C, LAI S C, LIN S C, et al A new approach to multi-aircraft air combat assignments. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 2012, 6, 39- 46.
doi: 10.1016/j.swevo.2012.03.003 |
38 | ZHOU L P, WAN S P, DONG J Y A fermatean fuzzy ELECTRE method for multi-criteria group decision-making. Informatica, 2022, 33 (1): 181- 224. |
39 |
JOSE R F, SALVATORE G, BERNARD R Electre-Score: a first outranking based method for scoring actions. European Journal of Operational Research, 2022, 297, 986- 1005.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2021.05.017 |
40 |
LOTFI A, DJAAFAR Z, KAMAL A, et al A novel epsilon-dominance Harris Hawks optimizer for multi-objective optimization in engineering design problems. Neural Computing and Applications, 2022, 34, 17007- 17036.
doi: 10.1007/s00521-022-07352-9 |
41 | SANDHOLM T, GILPIN A, CONITZER V Mixed-integer programming methods for finding Nash equilibria. Proc. of the 20th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2005, 2, 495- 501. |
42 |
SHANG K A survey on the hypervolume indicator in evolutionary multiobjective optimization. IEEE Trans. on Evolutionary Computation, 2021, 25 (1): 1- 20.
doi: 10.1109/TEVC.2020.3013290 |
43 |
REDDY M J, KUMAR D N Multiobjective differential evolution with application to reservoir system optimization. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 2007, 21 (2): 136- 146.
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2007)21:2(136) |
44 |
ZITZLER E, DEB K, THIELE L Comparison of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: empirical results. Evolutionary Computation, 2000, 8 (2): 173- 195.
doi: 10.1162/106365600568202 |
45 |
WU J H, ZHANG D Q, JIANG C, et al On reliability analysis method through rotational sparse grid nodes. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2021, 147, 107106.
doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107106 |
46 | SHAW R L. Fighter combat: tactics and maneuvering. Maryland: The United States Naval Institute Annapolis, 1985. |
47 | HAN Y T, ZHOU Q B, DUAN F Q A game strategy model in the digital curling system based on NFSP. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 2021, 8, 1857- 1863. |
48 | HU X W, LUO P C, ZHANG X N, et al Improved ant colony optimization for weapon-target assignment. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018, 2018, 6481635. |
No related articles found! |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||