Influencing factor analysis of interception probability and classification-regression neural network based estimation

doi:10.23919/JSEE.2023.000092

Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4): 992-1006.doi: 10.23919/JSEE.2023.000092

• • 上一篇

收稿日期:2021-06-30 出版日期:2023-08-18 发布日期:2023-08-28

Influencing factor analysis of interception probability and classification-regression neural network based estimation

Yi NAN¹(), Guoxing YI¹^,*(), Lei HU¹(), Changhong WANG¹(), Zhenbiao TU²()

¹ Department of Control Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
² Beijing Electro-mechanical Engineering Institute, Beijing 100074, China

Received:2021-06-30 Online:2023-08-18 Published:2023-08-28
Contact: Guoxing YI E-mail:nanyi11@163.com;ygx@hit.edu.cn;maple_hsjz@163.com;cwang@hit.edu.cn;tuzhenbiao@vip.sina.com
About author:
NAN Yi was born in 1989. She received her M.S. degree in control science and engineering, School of Astronautics, Harbin Institute of Technology in 2014. She is pursuing her Ph.D. degree in Harbin Institute of Technology. Her research fields include reinforcement learning, weapon system combat effectiveness evaluation, machine learning, and decision making. E-mail: nanyi11@163.com

YI Guoxing was born in 1974. He received his Ph.D. degree in control science and engineering, School of Astronautics, Harbin Institute of Technology. His research fields include unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) system and application technology, the mechanism and application of hemispherical resonance gyro, and the research of inertial and integrated navigation. E-mail: ygx@hit.edu.cn

HU Lei was born in 1993. He received his M.S. degree in control science and engineering, School of Astronautics, Harbin Institute of Technology in 2018. He is pursuing his Ph.D. degree in Harbin Institute of Technology. His research fields include artificial intelligence, unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) cluster, weapon system combat effectiveness, and decision-making. E-mail: maple_hsjz@163.com

WANG Changhong was born in 1961. He received his B.E., M. E., and Ph.D. degrees from Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China in 1983, 1986 and 1991, respectively. He is presently a full professor and the Deputy Dean of Academy of Science and Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology. His research interests include intelligent control and intelligent system, inertial technology, robotics, and precision servo system. E-mail: cwang@hit.edu.cn

TU Zhenbiao was born in 1977. He received his B.S. degree from Wuhan University of Science and Engineering, Wuhan, China, in 1999, and M.S. degree from Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China, in 2003. He is currently a researcher with Beijing Electro-Mechanical Engineering Institute, Beijing, China. His current research interests include operational effectiveness and mission planning. E-mail: tuzhenbiao@vip.sina.com
Supported by:
This work was supported by the Foundation Strengthening Program Technology Field Foundation (2020-JCJQ-JJ-132)

摘要/Abstract

Abstract:

The interception probability of a single missile is the basis for combat plan design and weapon performance evaluation, while its influencing factors are complex and mutually coupled. Existing calculation methods have very limited analysis of the influence mechanism of influencing factors, and none of them has analyzed the influence of the guidance law. This paper considers the influencing factors of both the interceptor and the target more comprehensively. Interceptor parameters include speed, guidance law, guidance error, fuze error, and fragment killing ability, while target performance includes speed, maneuverability, and vulnerability. In this paper, an interception model is established, Monte Carlo simulation is carried out, and the influence mechanism of each factor is analyzed based on the model and simulation results. Finally, this paper proposes a classification-regression neural network to quickly estimate the interception probability based on the value of influencing factors. The proposed method reduces the interference of invalid interception data to valid data, so its prediction accuracy is significantly better than that of pure regression neural networks.

Key words: interception probability, simulation modeling, analysis of influencing factors, probability estimation, neural networks

. [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 34(4): 992-1006.

Yi NAN, Guoxing YI, Lei HU, Changhong WANG, Zhenbiao TU. Influencing factor analysis of interception probability and classification-regression neural network based estimation[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 34(4): 992-1006.

图/表 21

参考文献 42

1	LEI H L, HU Z H. A calculation method of kill probability for air to air missile. Proc. of the 5th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design, 2012: 250−253.
2	MEI W, ZHENG C Y, LIU H. Adaptive optimization of ballistic dispersion for maneuvering target interception. Proc. of the 34th Chinese Control Conference, 2015: 283−287.
3	WANW Z, LI F G. Terminal efficiency of fragment air-to-air missile using monte carlo method. Proc. of the 8th International Conference on Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, 2017: 730−735.
4	LI L Y, LIU F X, LONG G Z, et al Intercepts allocation for layered defense. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2016, 27 (3): 602- 611. doi: 10.1109/JSEE.2016.00064
5	NA H, AHN J Framework to operate multiple ship defense missiles under uncertain evasive maneuvers of target. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2018, 232 (11): 2001- 2018.
6	LI A G, MENG Y N, HE Z K, et al Air-to-air missile kill probability calculation based on composite simpson. Computer Simulation, 2020, 37 (11): 24- 28.
7	YAO T L, WANG W L, MIAO R, et al Damage effectiveness assessment method for anti-ship missiles based on double hierarchy linguistic term sets and evidence theory. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 33 (2): 393- 405.
8	DUTTA D Probabilistic analysis of anti-ship missile defence effectiveness. Defence Science Journal, 2014, 64, 123- 129. doi: 10.14429/dsj.64.3532
9	ZHENG P T, YANG T, WANG B M Calculation research on kill probability of one missile. Journal of System Simulation, 2006, 18 (7): 1763- 1765.
10	GAO B, QIU L J, YAO Y T Research on kill probability for single airdefense missile. Joural of Ballistics, 2011, 23 (4): 52- 55.
11	FENG R B, ZHENG S Y, CHENG Y J, et al Research on kill probability of single air defense missile based on simulink. Ship Electronic Engineering, 2011, 31 (11): 88- 90,107.
12	DONG J J Simulation experiment of single-shot-kill probability of shipto-air missile. Fire Control and Command Control, 2002, 27, 87- 89,95.
13	BAO H Discussion on the calculation method of the kill probability of missile fragments to aircraft. China Plant Engineering, 2019, 15, 174- 176.
14	DHOTE K, DEODHAR R Effect of fragment dispersion on damage assessment of a directional fragment generator. International Journal of Damage Mechanics, 2018, 27 (4): 568- 577. doi: 10.1177/1056789517690215
15	KONOKMAN H E, KAYRAN A, KAYA M Aircraft vulnerability assessment against fragmentation warhead. Aerospace Science & Technology, 2017, 67, 215- 227.
16	LI J, WANG H B, ZHUANG Z H. Research on adaptive burst delay algorithm of laser fuze. Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Ubiquitous Wireless Broadband, 2016. DOI: 10.1109/ICUWB.2016.7790588.
17	YAN H, JIANG C L. Research on terminal efficiency of air-air missile against hypersonic weapons with gif (guidance integrated fuzing). Proc. of the 2nd International Asia Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics, 2010: 262–265.
18	BI K B, ZHANG Y F, LIU Y The penetration effect analysis of variable trajectory maneuvers of missiles. Tactical Missile Technology, 2016, 3, 32- 36.
19	FAN Z E, GU W J, JIANG P Research on penetration effect of terminal maneuver for anti-ship missile based on monte carlo method. Journal of Naval Aeronautical and Astronautical University, 2010, 25 (3): 241- 246.
20	LI W, WEN Q Q, HE L, et al Three-dimensional impact angle constrained distributed cooperative guidance law for anti-ship missiles. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 32 (2): 447- 459.
21	MA L. The moedling and simulation of antiship missile terminal maneuver penetration ability. Proc. of the 36th Chinese Control Conference, 2017: 2622–2626.
22	ZHANG H, ZHANG Y Q, ZHANG P F. Optimal guidance law for intercepting the active defense aircraft with terminal angle constraint. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021, 1828(1): 012160.
23	NAN Y, YI G X, WANG C H, et al A novel effectiveness evaluation method based on simultaneous probabilistic finite-state machines. IEEE Systems Journal, 2019, 14 (2): 1611- 1622.
24	ZHOU D, QU P P, SUN S A guidance law with terminal impact angle constraint accounting for missile autopilot. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 2013, 135 (5): 051009. doi: 10.1115/1.4024202
25	MA M C, TAN L G, SONG S M Three-dimensional sliding mode guidance law for maneuvering target with prescribed performance and input saturation. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, 2021, 43 (5): 1176- 1190.
26	SI Y J, SONG S Three-dimensional adaptive finite-time guidance law for intercepting maneuvering targets. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2017, 30 (6): 1985- 2003. doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2017.04.009
27	QU P P. Guidance laws of homing missiles based on dynamic surface control. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2013.
28	ZHANG L, WEI C Z, WU R, et al Fixed-time adaptive model reference sliding mode control for an air-to-ground missile. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2019, 32 (5): 1268- 1280. doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2018.10.008
29	LI Z X, ZHANG R Time-varying sliding mode control of missile based on suboptimal method. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 32 (3): 700- 710.
30	WANG D Z, TENG K N, XIAO Y J, et al Relay guidance decision-making of surface-to-air missile based on guidance error. Electronics Optics & Control, 2019, 26 (9): 1- 4.
31	SUN B, LI J P, ZHENG J Q The research on infrared imaging gif technology of ground-to-air missile. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 2013, 33 (1): 63- 66.
32	FAN M G, PENG Z Y, LUO X L, et al. Prediction of time to go of air imaging gif. Proceedings of the SPIE, 2011, 8193: 1230−1236.
33	JI Y, REN H B, JIAN J L, et al An adaptive initiating control algorithm based on phased array fuze. Electronics Optics & Control, 2017, 24 (5): 65- 66, 92.
34	REN X L, LI G Research status and trends of tactical ballistic missile interception technology. Cruise Missile, 2019, (7): 41- 46.
35	ZHAO K, CAO D Q, HUANG W H Integrated design of maneuver, guidance and control for penetration missile. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 40 (9): 2040- 2047.
36	FU S N, ZHOU G Q, XIA Q L A trajectory shaping guidance law with field-of-view angle constraint and terminal limits. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 33 (2): 426- 437.
37	WANG L, LI X H, LIU Y F, et al. Study of anti-personnel warhead killing power based on the specific kinetic energy lethality criteria. Proc. of Aeronautical Test Technology Academic Conference, 2012: 88–90. (in Chinese)
38	ZHANG L, MA L, WU Q, Penetration ability simulation of spiral maneuvering anti-ship missile against ship-to-air missile. Tactical Missile Technology, 2015, 173(5): 36–40. (in Chinese)
39	GAO A, HU Y S The optimization and evaluation of ballistic missile defense system interception scheme based on probability model. Acta Armamentarii, 2016, 37 (2): 379- 384.
40	HU L, YI G X, HUANG C, et al Research on dynamic weapon target assignment based on cross-entropy. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2020, 2020, 8618065.
41	FENG P, SHI Y H, SHANG P, et al Application of BP artificial neural network in preparation of Ni–W graded coatings. Materials, 2021, 14 (22): 6781. doi: 10.3390/ma14226781
42	WU W, FENG G R, LI Z X, et al Deterministic convergence of an online gradient method for BP neural networks. IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks, 2005, 16 (3): 533- 540. doi: 10.1109/TNN.2005.844903

Influencing factor	Parameter
Guidance law	SMGAAC or PG
Velocity of the interceptor	${V_m}$
Guidance error	${\sigma _G}$
Fuze delay time error	${\sigma _D}$
Fragment	${N_{{\rm{FT}}} }$ and ${\sigma _F}$
Velocity of the target	${V_t}$
Maneuver	Spiral ( ${R_{{\rm{IT}}} }$ , ${V_m}$ ) or no maneuver
Vulnerability	${h_T}$ and ${S_{{\rm{TV}}} }$

${P_{{\rm{area}}} }$	NN	MAE	${ {\rm{AE} }_{{\rm{max}}} }$
${P_{{\rm{area}}} }$	NN	MAE	AE	ACT	EST
0.01−1.0	CR	0.025	0.259	0.414	0.156
0.01−1.0	PR	0.037	0.552	0.689	0.137
0.1−0.3	CR	0.026	0.179	0.291	0.112
0.1−0.3	PR	0.041	0.246	0.255	0.009
0.3−0.5	CR	0.053	0.259	0.414	0.156
0.3−0.5	PR	0.075	0.362	0.414	0.052
0.5−0.7	CR	0.027	0.058	0.689	0.631
0.5−0.7	PR	0.123	0.552	0.689	0.138
0.7−0.9	CR	0.021	0.021	0.720	0.699
0.7−0.9	PR	0.058	0.058	0.720	0.662

${P_{{\rm{area}}} }$	NN	MAPE	${ {\rm{APE} }_{{\rm{max}}} }$
${P_{{\rm{area}}} }$	NN	MAPE	APE	ACT	EST
0.01−0.9	CR	0.145	0.707	0.101	0.172
0.01−0.9	PR	0.226	0.963	0.255	0.009
0.1−0.3	CR	0.153	0.707	0.101	0.172
0.1−0.3	PR	0.041	0.246	0.255	0.009
0.3−0.5	CR	0.053	0.259	0.414	0.156
0.3−0.5	PR	0.075	0.362	0.414	0.052
0.5−0.7	CR	0.027	0.058	0.689	0.631
0.5−0.7	PR	0.123	0.552	0.689	0.138
0.7~ 0.9	CR	0.021	0.021	0.720	0.699
0.7~ 0.9	PR	0.058	0.058	0.720	0.662

Influencing factor analysis of interception probability and classification-regression neural network based estimation

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 21

参考文献 42

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价