A review of periodic orbits in the circular restricted three-body problem

doi:10.23919/JSEE.2022.000059

摘要/Abstract

Abstract:

This review article aims to give a comprehensive review of periodic orbits in the circular restricted three-body problem (CRTBP), which is a standard ideal model for the Earth-Moon system and is closest to the practical mechanical model. It focuses the attention on periodic orbits in the Earth-Moon system. This work is primarily motivated by a series of missions and plans that take advantages of the three-body periodic orbits near the libration points or around two gravitational celestial bodies. Firstly, simple periodic orbits and their classi?cation that is usually considered to be early work before 1970 are summarized, and periodic orbits around Lagrange points, either planar or three-dimensional, are intensively studied during past decades. Subsequently, stability index of a periodic orbit and bifurcation analysis are presented, which demonstrate a guideline to ?nd more periodic orbits inspired by bifurcation signals. Then, the practical techniques for computing a wide range of periodic orbits and associated quasi-periodic orbits, as well as constructing database of periodic orbits by numerical searching techniques are also presented. For those unstable periodic orbits, the station keeping maneuvers are reviewed. Finally, the applications of periodic orbits are presented, including those in practical missions, under consideration, and still in conceptual design stage. This review article has the function of bridging between engineers and researchers, so as to make it more convenient and faster for engineers to understand the complex restricted three-body problem (RTBP). At the same time, it can also provide some technical thinking for general researchers.

Key words: periodic orbit, restricted three-body problem, classification, orbit family, bifurcation

. [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 33(3): 612-646.

Renyong ZHANG. A review of periodic orbits in the circular restricted three-body problem[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 33(3): 612-646.

图/表 28

Mission	Operator	Orbit/Type	Scienti?c objective	Year	Launch/Dry mass/kg	References
ISEE-3	NASA, ESA	L₁/L₂-Halo¹ 1st mission	Solar wind, Earth’s magnetic ?eld	1978	479/390	[206–212]
WIND	NASA	L₁-Quasi-halo¹	Solar wind/Earth’s magnetosphere monitor	1994	1250/950	[13–17]
SOHO	NASA, ESA	L₁-Halo¹	Solar observatory	1996	1850/610	[213–217]
ACE	NASA	L₁-Lissajous¹	Energetic particles solar wind	1997	757/562	[218–220]
WMAP	NASA	L₂-Lissajous¹	Cosmic microwaves, Background radiation	2001	835/763	[221, 222]
Genesis	NASA	L₁-Quasi-Halo¹	Solar wind particles samples and particles	2001	636/494	[20, 175, 223]
Herschel	ESA	L₂-Halo¹	Far-infrared telescope, Formation of galaxies	2009	3400/2800	[224–233]
Chang’e?2	China	L₂-Halo¹	Extend mission, Visited asteroid	2010	2480/1180	[234–237]
GAIA	ESA	L₂-Halo¹	Galactic structure, Astrometry	2013	2029/1392	[238–241]
LISA	ESA	L₁-Quasi-Halo¹	Gravitational wave	2015	1910/810	[242, 243]
DSCOVR	NASA, ESA	L₁-Lissajous	Space weather/climate Earth observation	2015	570/307	[244–246]
Artemis	NASA	L₁-Quasi-Halo¹ 1st mission	Extend mission, Lunar magnetosphere	2007	128/77	[1, 160, 244–248]
Que-qiao	China	L₂-Halo²	Communication relay	2018	425/325	[249–251]
DRO	China	DRO	Earth-Moon space exploration	2022	#	#
TESS	NASA	2:1Resonant²	Search exoplanets	2018	362/317	[9–12]
LOP-G	NASA, Russia	NRHO²	Lunar station, Space gateway	#	#	[4–8]
JWST	NASA, ESA	L₂-Halo¹	Space telescope, Universe observatory	2021	6500/#	[3, 252, 253]
IXO	NASA, ESA, JAXA	L₂-Lissajous¹	International X-ray observatory	#	#	[254, 255]
Stellar imager	NASA	L₂-Halo¹	Interferometry of stellar surface	#	#	[177, 256–259]
Eddington	ESA	L₂-Halo¹	Earth-like planets, Stellar observations	2003*	#	[260–262]
Darwin	ESA	L₂-Halo¹	Search for life	2007*	#	[263]
TPF	NASA	L₂-Halo¹	Detecting planets	2007*	#	[264, 265]

参考文献 265

1	WOODARD M, FOLTA D, WOODFORK D. ARTEMIS: the first mission to the lunar libration orbits. https://www.issfd.org/ISSFD_2009/InterMissionDesignI/Woodard.pdf.
2	STRANGE N, LANDAU D, MCELRATH T, et al. Overview of mission design for NASA asteroid redirect robotic mission concept. https://trs.jpl.nasa.gov/bitstream/handle/2014/44361/13–4555_A1b.pdf?sequence=1.
3	NASA. JWST vital facts: mission goals. NASA james web space telescope. https://jwst.nasa. gov/facts.html.
4	WHITLEY R, MARTINEZ R. Options for staging orbits in cis–lunar space. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20150019648/downloads/20150019648.pdf.
5	SLOSS P. NASA updates lunar gateway plans. https://www. Nasaspaceflight.com/2018/09/nasa–lunar–gateway–plans/.
6	MERRI M, SARKARATI M. Lunar orbiter platform–gateway: a clear use case for CCSDS MO services. Proc. of the AIAA Space and Astronautics Forum and Exposition, 2018: 5337.
7	LEVACK D J, HORTON J F, JOYNER C R, et al. Mars NTP architecture elements using the lunar orbital platform–gateway. Proc. of the AIAA Space and Astronautics Forum and Exposition, 2018: 5105.
8	BURNS J O, MELLINKOFF B, SPYDELL M, et al. Science on the lunar surface facilitated by low latency telerobotics from a lunar orbital platform–gateway. Acta Astronautica, 2019, 154: 195–203.
9	RICKER G R, WINN J N, VANDERSPEK R, et al. Transiting exoplanet survey satellite. Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 2014, 1(1): 14003.
10	SULLIVAN P W, WINN J N, BERTA–THOMPSO Z K, et al. The transiting exoplanet survey satellite: simulations of planet detections and astrophysical false positives. The Astrophysical Journal 2015, 809(1): 77.
11	RICKER G R, VANDERSPEK R K, LATHAM D W, et al. The transiting exoplanet survey satellite mission. Proc. of the American Astronomical Society Meeting, 2014, 224: 113.02.
12	OVERBYE D. NASA’s TESS starts collecting planets.https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/20/science/nasa–tess–planets.html.
13	APTEKAR R L, FREDERIKS D D, GOLENETSKII S V, et al. Gamma–ray burst experiment for the GGS wind spacecraft. Space Science Reviews, 1995, 71(1–4): 265–272.
14	VON–ROSENVINGE T T, BARBIER L M, KARSCH J, et al. The energetic particles: acceleration, composition, and transport (EPACT) investigation on the wind spacecraft. Space Science Reviews, 1995, 71(1–4): 155–206.
15	KASPER J C, LAZARUS A J, STEINBERG J T, et al. Physics–based tests to identify the accuracy of solar wind ion measurements: a case study with the wind faraday cups. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 2006, 111(A3): A03105.
16	WILSON III L B, CATTELL C, KELLOGG P J, et al. Waves in interplanetary shocks: a wind/waves study. Physical Review Letters, 2007, 99(4) : 41101.
17	KASPER J C, LAZARUS A J, GARY S P. Hot solar–wind helium: direct evidence for local heating by alfven–cyclotron dissipation. Physical Review Letters, 2008, 101(26): 261103.
18	FRANZ H. Wind lunar backflip and distant prograde orbit implementation. Proc. of the 11th Annual AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, 2001: 999–1017.
19	FARQUHAR R. The flight of ISEE–3/ICE–origins, mission history, and a legacy. Proc. of the AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit, 1988: 4464.
20	LO M, WILLIAMS B, BOLLMAN W, et al. Genesis mission design. Proc. of the AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit, 1998: 4468.
21	POINCARE H. Les methodes nouvelles de la mecanique celeste. Paris: Gauthier–Villars, 1892.
22	MOULTON F R. Periodic orbits. 161st ed. Washington: Carnegie Institution of Washington, 1920.
23	FARQUHAR R W. The control and use of libration–point satellites. California: Stanford University, 1968.
24	FARQUHAR R W. The control and use of libration–point satellites. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19710000821/downloads/19710000821.pdf.
25	FARQUHAR R W. Halo–orbit and lunar–swingby missions of the 1990’s. Acta Astronautica, 1991, 24(C): 227–234.
26	BREAKWELL J V, KAMEL A A, RATNER M J. Station–keeping for a translunar communication station. Celestial Mechanics 1974, 10(3): 357–373.
27	BREAKWELL J V, BROWN J V. The ‘halo’ family of 3–dimensional periodic orbits in the Earth–Moon restricted 3–body problem. Celestial Mechanics, 1979, 20(4): 389–404.
28	BUSH G W. The vision for space exploration. https://www.nasa. gov /pdf/55583main_vision_ space_exploration2.pdf .
29	FOUST J. NASA seeks information on developing deep space gateway module. https://spacenews.com/nasa–seeks–information–on–developing–deep–space–gateway–module/.
30	FOUST J. NASA issues study contracts for deep space gateway element. https://spacenews.com/nasa–issues–study–contracts–for–deep–space–gateway–element/.
31	HANNEKE W. NASA and Russia partner up for crewed deep–space missions. https://www.Space.com.
32	GODWIN C. NASA’s human spaceflight plans come into focus with announcement of deep space gateway. https://www.spaceflightinsider.com/organizations/nasa/nasa-human–spaceflight–plans–focus–announcement–deep–space–gateway/.
33	SZEBEHELY V. Theory of orbits: the restricted problem of three bodies. New York: Academic Press, 1967.
34	FARQUHAR R W, KAMEL A A. Quasi–periodic orbits about the translunar libration point. Celestial Mechanics, 1973, 7(4): 458–473.
35	PERGOLA P, ALESSI E M. Libration point orbit characterization in the Earth–Moon system. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2012, 426(2): 1212–1222.
36	FOLTA D C, PAVLAK T A, HAAPALA A F, et al. Earth–Moon libration point orbit stationkeeping: theory, modeling, and operations. Acta Astronautica, 2014, 94(1): 421–433.
37	LIU X, BAOYIN H, MA X. Equilibria, periodic orbits around equilibria, and heteroclinic connections in the gravity field of a rotating homogeneous cube. Astrophysics and Space Science, 2011, 333(2): 409–418.
38	ENGELBORGHS K, LUZYANINA T, ROOSE D. Numerical bifurcation analysis of periodic solutions of partial differential equations. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2000, 125(1/2): 265–275.
39	CREANGA D, NADEJDE C, GASNER P. Dynamical analysis of heart beat from the viewpoint of chaos theory. Romanian Journal of Physics, 2011, 56(1/2): 177–184.
40	GREBOW D J. Trajectory design in the Earth–Moon system and lunar south pole coverage. Indiana: Purdue University, 2010.
41	TOPPUTO F. Low–thrust non–Keplerian orbits: analysis, design, and control. Milan: Polytechnic University of Milan, 2007.
42	HADJIDEMETRIOU J D. The continuation of periodic orbits from the restricted to the general three–body problem. Celestial Mechanics, 1975, 12(2): 155–174.
43	BOZIS G, HADJIDEMETRIOU J D. On the continuation of periodic orbits from the restricted to the general three–body problem. Celestial Mechanics, 1976, 13(2): 127–136.
44	CHICONE C, RHOUMA M B H, CHICONE C. On the continuation of periodic orbits. Methods and Applications of Analysis, 2000, 7(1): 85–104.
45	ALLGOWER E L, GEORG K. Introduction to numerical continuation methods. Pennsylvania: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2003.
46	SIMO C. On the analytical and numerical approximation of invariant manifolds. Modern Methods in Celestial Mechanics, 1990, 1: 285–329.
47	GREBOW D. Generating periodic orbits in the circular restricted three−body problem with applications to lunar south pole coverage. Indiana: Purdue University, 2006.
48	DARWIN G H. Periodic orbits. Acta Mathematica, 1897, 21(1): 99–242.
49	DARWIN G H. On certain families of periodic orbits. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 1909, 70(2): 108–143.
50	GOUDAS C L. Three–dimensional periodic orbits and their stability. Icarus, 1963, 2: 1–18.
51	CHENCINER A. Poincare and the three–body problem. http://www.bourbaphy.fr/chenciner.pdf.
52	MOULTON F R. A class of periodic orbits of superior planets. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 1912, 13(1): 96–108.
53	HOWELL K. Families of orbits in the vicinity of the collinear libration points. The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 2001, 49(1): 107–125.
54	STROMGREN E. Forms of periodic motion in the restricted problem and in the general problem of three bodies, according to researches executed at the observatory copenhagen. https://adsabs.harvard.edu/pdf/1922PCopO.
55	STROMGREN E. Connaisance actuelle des orbites dans le probleme des trois corps. https://adsabs.harvard.edu/pdf/1933BuAst.
56	HILL G W. On the part of the motion of the lunar perigee which is a function of the mean motions of the sun and moon. Acta Mathematica, 1886, 8(1): 1–36.
57	HENON M. Exploration numerique du probleme restreint. I. Masses egales; orbites periodiques. Annales d’Astrophysique, 1965, 28: 499.
58	HENON M. Exploration numerique du probleme restreint. II. Masses egales, stabilite des orbites periodiques. Annales d’Astrophysique, 1965, 28: 992.
59	HENON M. Numerical exploration of the restricted problem. VI. Hill’s case: non–periodic orbits. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1970, 9: 24–36.
60	HENON M. Explorationes numerique du probleme restreint IV: masses egales, orbites non periodique. Bullettin Astronomique, 1966, 3(1): 49–66.
61	HENON M. Numerical exploration of the restricted problem. V. Hill’s case: periodic orbits and their stability. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1969, 1: 223–238.
62	BRAY T A, GOUDAS C L. Three–dimensional periodic oscillations about L1, L2, and L3. Washington: Advances in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1967.
63	MARCHAL C. The three–body problem. New York: Elsevier, 1990.
64	Giacaglia G E O. Periodic orbits, stability and resonances. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1970.
65	HENON M, NICE O D, RESERVED A R. Vertical stability of periodic orbits in the restricted problem. Celestial Mechanics, 1973, 8(2): 269–272.
66	HENON M. Vertical stability of periodic orbits in the restricted problem. I. equal masses. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1973, 28(2): 415.
67	HENON M. Vertical stability of periodic orbits in the restricted problem. II. Hill’s case. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1974, 30(2): 317.
68	KAZANTZIS P G. The structure of periodic solutions in the restricted problem of the three bodies II: Sun–Jupiter case. Astrophysics and Space Science, 1978, 59(2): 355–371.
69	ROBIN I A, MARKELLOS V V. Numerical determination of three–dimensional periodic orbits generated from vertical self−resonant satellite orbits. Celestial Mechanics, 1980, 21(4): 395–434.
70	FARQUHAR R W. The utilization of halo orbits in advanced lunar operations. Maryland: Goddard Space Flight Center, 1971.
71	ZAGOURAS C G, KAZANTZIS P G. Three–dimensional periodic oscillations generating from plane periodic ones around the collinear Lagrangian points. Astrophysics and Space Science, 1979, 61(2): 389–409.
72	MICHALODIMITRAKIS M. A new type of connection between the families of periodic orbits of the restricted problem. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1978, 64: 83–86.
73	ICHTIAROGLOU S, MICHALODIMITRAKIS M. Three–body problem–the existence of families of three–dimensional periodic orbits which bifurcate from planar periodic orbits. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1980, 81(1/2): 30–32.
74	XU M, XU S J. Exploration of distant retrograde orbits around moon. Acta Astronautica, 2009, 65 (5/6): 853–860.
75	BREAKWELL J. Trajectories launched normal to the elliptic. Proc. of the 14th International Astronautical Congress, 1963.
76	HOWELL K C, BREAKWELL J V. Almost rectilinear halo orbits. Celestial Mechanics, 1984, 32(1): 29–52.
77	ZAGOURAS C G. Three–dimensional periodic orbits about the triangular equilibrium points of the restricted problem of three bodies. Celestial Mechanics, 1985, 37(1): 27–46.
78	GREBOW D J, OZIMEK M T, HOWELL K C, et al. Multibody orbit architectures for lunar south pole coverage. Journal of Spacecraft & Rockets, 2008, 45(2): 344–358.
79	MURRAY C D, DERMOTT S F. Solar system dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1999.
80	WHITTAKER E. Analytical dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1902.
81	INCE E L. Ordinary differential equations. New York: Longmans Green, 1926.
82	CESARI L. Asymptotic behavior and stability problems in ordinary differential equations. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
83	BIRKHOFF G D. Surface transformations and their dynamical applications. Acta Mathematica, 1922, 43(1): 1–119.
84	MESSAGE J. Some periodic orbits in the restricted problem of three bodies and their stabilities. Astronomical Journal, 1959, 64(6): 226–236.
85	WINTNER A. Three notes on characteristic exponents and equations of variation in celestial mechanics. American Journal of Mathematics, 1931, 53(3): 605–625.
86	ROSENTHAL J. The equation of stability of periodic orbits of the restricted problem of three bodies in Thiele’s regularising coordinates. American Journal of Mathematics, 1931, 53(3): 626–630.
87	DANBY J M A. Stability of the triangular points in the elliptic restricted problem of three bodies. The Astronomical Journal, 1964, 69: 165.
88	BROUCKE R A. Periodic orbits in the restricted three–body problem with earth–moon masses. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19680013800/downloads/19680013800.pdf.
89	CAMPBELL E T. Bifurcation from families of periodic solutions in the cicular restricted problem with application trajectory design. Indiana: Purdue University, 1999.
90	SEYDEL R. Practical bifurcation and stability analysis. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media, 2009.
91	ZAGOURAS C G, KALOGEROPOULOU M. Numerical determination of families of three–dimensional periodic orbits bifurcating from plane periodic orbits around both primaries. Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, 1978, 32: 307–321.
92	MARKELLOS V V. Bifurcations of plane with three–dimensional asymmetric periodic orbits in the restricted three–body problem. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 1977, 180(2): 103–116.
93	PAPADAKIS K, ZAGOURAS C. Bifurcation points and intersections of families of periodic orbits in the three–dimensional restricted three–body problem. Astrophysics and Space Sciences, 1993, 199: 241–256.
94	HOWELL K C, CAMPBELL E T. Three–dimensional periodic solutions that bifurcate from halo families in the circular restricted three–body problem. Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, 1999, 102: 891–910.
95	KAZANTZIS P G, GOUDAS C L. A grid search for three–dimensional motions and three new types of such motions. Astrophysics and Space Science, 1975 32(1): 95–113.
96	MARKELLOS V V, GOUDAS C L, KATSIARIS G A. Bifurcations of planar to three–dimensional periodic orbits in the restricted three–body problem. Celestial Mechanics, 1981, 25(1): 3–31.
97	MARKELLOS V V. Numerical investigation of the planar restricted three–body problem. Celestial Mechanics, 1974, 10(1): 87–134.
98	HENON M. Generating families in the restricted three–body problem. II. qualitative study of bifurcations. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media, 1997.
99	IOOSS G, JOSEPH D D. Bifurcation and stability of nT–periodic solutions branching from T–periodic solutions at points of resonance. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 1977, 66(2): 135–172.
100	KUZNETSOV Y A. Elements of applied bifurcation theory. New York: Springer, 1998.
101	REICHL L E. The transition to chaos in conservative classical systems: quantum manifestations. New York: Springer, 1992.
102	DICHMANN D J, DOEDEL E J, PAFFENROTH R C. The computation of periodic solutions of the 3–body problem using the numerical continuation software AUTO. Proc. of the International Conference on Libration Point Orbits and Applications, 2003: 429–488.
103	DOEDEL E J, PAFFENROTH R C, KELLER H B, et al. Computation of periodic solutions of conservative systems with application to the 3–body problem. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 2003, 13(6): 1353–1381.
104	DOEDEL E J, ROMANOV V A, PAFFENROTH R C, et al. Elemental periodic orbits associated with the libration points in the circular restricted 3–body problem. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 2007, 17(8): 2625–2677.
105	GAUTSCHI W. Numerical analysis: an introduction. Barton: Birkhauser, 1997.
106	MATUKUMA T. On the periodic orbits in Hill’s case. Proceedings of the Imperial Academy, 1930, 6(1): 6–8.
107	MATUKUMA T. Periodic orbits in Hill’s case. second paper (retrograde variational orbits). Proceedings of the Imperial Academy, 1932, 8(5): 147–150.
108	MATUKUMA T. Periodic orbits in Hill’s case. third paper (periodic ejectional orbit). Proceedings of the Imperial Academy, 1933, 9(8): 364–366.
109	EGOROV V A. Certain problems of moon flight dynamics. The Russian Literature of Satellites, 1958, 1: 107–174.
110	BROUCKE M R. Recherches d’orbites periodiques dans le probleme restreint plan (systeme Terre–Lune). Leuven: Universite Catholique de Louvain, 1962.
111	HUANG S S. Preliminary study of orbits of interest for moon probes. The Astronomical Journal, 1962, 67: 304.
112	ARENSTORF R F. Periodic solutions of the restricted three body problem representing analytic continuations of Keplerian elliptic motions. American Journal of Mathematics, 1963, 85(1): 27–35.
113	THUNNG B. Zwei spezieller mondeinfang bahnen in der raumfahrt um erde und mond. Astronautica Acta, 1959, 5: 241–250.
114	BUCHHEIM R. Lunar flight trajectories in space technology. New York: Wiley Edition, 1959.
115	SZEBEHELY V, PIERCE D A, STANDISH S. A group of earth to moon trajectories with consecutive collisions. Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics: Celestial Mechanics and Astrodynamics, 1964, 14: 35–51.
116	KUIPER G P. On the interpretation of beta lyrae and other close binaries. The Astrophysical Journal, 1941, 93: 133.
117	KOPAL Z. Evolutionary processes in close binary stars. Annales d’Astrophysique, 1956, 19: 298.
118	ABBYANKAR K D. Stability of straight–line solutions in the restricted problem of three bodies. The Astronomical Journal, 1959, 64: 163.
119	GOULD N L. Particle trajectories around close binary systems. The Astronomical Journal, 1959, 64: 136.
120	DEPRIT A, HENRARD J. Symmetric doubly asymptotic orbits in the restricted three–body problem. The Astronomical Journal, 1965, 70: 271.
121	BENEST D. Effects of the mass ratio on the existence of retrograde satellites in the circular restricted problem. IV–three–dimensional stability of plane periodic orbits. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1977, 54 : 563–568.
122	RESTREPO R L, RUSSELL R P. A database of planar axi–symmetric periodic orbits for the solar system. Proc. of the AAS Astrodynamics Specialists Conference, 2017: AAS 17–694.
123	RESTREPO R L, RUSSELL R P. Patched periodic orbits: a systematic strategy for low energy transfer design. Proc. of the AAS Astrodynamics Specialists Conference, 2017: AAS 17–695.
124	WINTNER A. The analytical foundations of celestial mechanics. North Chelmsford: Courier Corporation, 2014.
125	BARRAR R B. Existence of periodic orbits of the second kind in the restricted problems of three bodies. The Astronomical Journal, 1965, 70(1): 3–4.
126	GOODRICH E F. Numerical determination of short period Trojan orbits in the restricted three body problem. Astronomical Journal, 1966, 71: 88.
127	DEPRIT A, JACQUES H, PALMORE J, et al. The trojan manifold in the system Earth–Moon. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 1967, 137(3): 311–335.
128	RICHARDSON D L, CARY N D. A uniformly valid solution for motion about the interior libration point of the perturbed elliptic–restricted problem. Proc. of the AIAA Conference on the Exploration of the Outer Planets, 1975: 28-30.
129	MARKELLOS V V. Asymmetric periodic orbits in three dimensions. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 1978, 184(2): 273–281.
130	HOWELL K C. Three–dimensional, periodic, ‘halo’ orbits. Celestial Mechanics, 1984, 32(1): 53–71.
131	MARKELLOS V V. Numerical investigation of the planar restricted three–body problem. II. Regions of stability for retrograde satellites of Jupiter as determined by periodic orbits of the second generation. Celestial Mechanics, 1974, 10(1): 365–380.
132	MARKELLOS V V. Numerical investigation of the planar restricted three–body problem. I. Periodic orbits of the second generation in the Sun–Jupiter system. Celestial Mechanics, 1974, 10(1): 87–134.
133	MARKELLOS V V. Numerical investigation of the planar restricted three–body problem. III–Closed branches of families f and related periodic orbits of the elliptic problem. Celestial Mechanics, 1975, 12: 215–224.
134	HENON M, LUTZE F. Generating families in the restricted three–body problem, II: quantitative study of bifurcations. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 2002, 55(6): B107.
135	KANAVOS S S, MARKELLOS V V, PERDIOS E A, et al. The photogravitational Hill problem: numerical exploration. Earth Moon & Planets, 2002, 91(4): 223–241.
136	RUSSELL R P. Global search for planar and three–dimensional periodic orbits near Europa. Proc. of the AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, 2005: 645–672.
137	RUSSELL R P. Global search for planar and three–dimensional periodic orbits near Europa. The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 2006, 54(2): 199–226.
138	HENON M. Explorationes numerique du probleme restreint IV: masses egales, orbites non periodique,. Bullettin Astronomique, 1966, 3(1): 49–66.
139	YU Y, BAOYIN H. Generating families of 3D periodic orbits about asteroids. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2012, 427(1): 872–881.
140	YU Y, BAOYIN H. Orbital dynamics in the vicinity of asteroid 216 Kleopatra. The Astronomical Journal, 2012, 143(3): 62.
141	YU Y, BAOYIN H. Resonant orbits in the vicinity of asteroid 216 Kleopatra. Astrophysics and Space Science, 2013, 343(1): 75–82.
142	JIANG Y, BAOYIN H, LI J, et al. Orbits and manifolds near the equilibrium points around a rotating asteroid. Astrophysics and Space Science, 2014, 349(1): 83–106.
143	PAVLAK T A. Trajectory design and orbit maintenance strategies in multi–body dynamical regimes. Indiana: Purdue University, 2013.
144	SERBAN R, KOON W S, LO M W, et al. Halo orbit mission correction maneuvers using optimal control. Automatica, 2002, 38(4): 571–583.
145	SHIROBOKOV M, TROFIMOV S, OVCHINNIKOV M. Survey of station–keeping techniques for libration point orbits. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2017, 40(5): 1085–1105.
146	XU M. Stationkeeping strategy of halo orbit in linear periodic control. Aerospace Control, 2008, 26(3): 13–18.
147	XU M, ZHOU N, WANG J. Robust adaptive strategy for stationkeeping of halo orbit. Proc. of the IEEE 24th Chinese Control and Decision Conference, 2012: 3086–3091.
148	XU L. How China’s lunar relay satellite arrived in its final orbit. https://www.planetary.org/articles/ 20180615–queqiao–orbit–explainer.
149	HOU X Y, LIU L. On the transfer and control of spacecrafts around the point of the sun–earth+moon system. Acta Astronomica Sinica, 2007, 48: 364–373.
150	GOMEZ G, HOWELL K, MASDEMONT J, et al. Station–keeping strategies for translunar libration point orbits. Advances in Astronautical Sciences, 1998, 99(2): 949–967.
151	HEUBERGER H. Halo orbit station keeping for international sun–earth explorer-C/ISEE-C. Proc. of the AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, 1977: 77–165.
152	XU M. Overview of orbital dynamics and control for libration point orbits. Journal of Astronautics, 2009, 30(4): 1300–1313.
153	HOWELL K C, PERNICKA H J. Station–keeping method for libration point trajectories. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1993, 16(1): 151–159.
154	HOWELL K C, MAINS D L, BARDEN B T. Transfer trajectories from Earth parking orbits to Sun–Earth halo orbits. Proc. of the AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, 1994: 94–160.
155	KEETER T M. Station–keeping strategies for libration point orbits–target point and floquet mode approaches. Indiana: Purdue University, 1994.
156	GOMEZ G, LLIBRE J, MARTINEZ R, et al. Station keeping of a quasiperiodic halo orbit using invariant manifolds. Proc. of the 2nd International Symposium on Spacecraft Flight Dynamics, 1986: 65–70.
157	SIMO C, GOMEZ G, LLIBRE J, et al. On the optimal station keeping control of halo orbits. Acta Astronautica, 1987, 15(6/7): 391–397.
158	GOMEZ G, JORBA A, SIMO C, et al. Study of the transfer between halo orbits. Acta Astronautica, 1998, 43(9/10): 493–520.
159	JANES L, BECKMAN M. Stationkeeping maneuvers for the James Webb Space Telescope. Proc. of the Goddard Flight Mechanics Symposium, 2005: 1–16.
160	FOLTA D, WOODARD M, COSGROVE D. Stationkeeping of the first earth–moon libration orbiters: the artemis mission. Proc. of the Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, 2011: AAS 11–515.
161	FOLTA D C, WOODARD M, PAVLAK T, et al. Earth–moon libration stationkeeping: theory, modeling, and operations. Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, 2012, 145: 489–507.
162	SCHEERES D J, HSIAO F Y, VINH N X. Stabilizing motion relative to an unstable orbit: applications to spacecraft formation flight. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2003, 26(1): 62–73.
163	WIE B, BYUN K W, WARREN V W, et al. New approach to attitude/momentum control for the space station. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1989, 12(5): 714–722.
164	WARREN W, WIE B, GELLER D. Periodic–disturbance accommodating control of the space station for asymptotic momentum management. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1990, 13(6): 984–992.
165	WIE B, GONZALEZ M. Control synthesis for flexible space structures excited by persistent disturbances. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1992, 15(1): 73–80.
166	WIE B, LIU Q, BAUER F. Classical and robust H (infinity) control redesign for the hubble space telescope. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1993, 16(6): 1069–1077.
167	CIELASZYK D, WIE B. New approach to halo orbit determination and control. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1996, 19(2): 266–273.
168	HOFFMAN D. Station–keeping at the collinear equilibrium points of the earth–moon system. Huston: NASA, 1993.
169	FOLTA D, BECKMAN M. Libration orbit mission design: applications of numerical and dynamical methods. Singapore: World Scientific, 2003.
170	ROSS S, LO M, ROSS S. The lunar gateway: portal to the stars and beyon. Proc. of the AIAA Space Conference and Exposition, 2001. DOI: 10.2514/6.2001–4768.
171	RENAULT C A, SCHEERES D J. Statistical analysis of control maneuvers in unstable orbital environments. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2003, 26(5): 758–769.
172	GERARD G, JAUME L, MARTINEZ R. Dynamics and mission design near libration points: fundamentals–the case of collinear libration points. Singapore: World Scientific, 2001.
173	GOMEZ G, LLIBRE J, MARTINEZ R, et al. Dynamics and mission design near libration points: fundamentals–the case of triangular libration points. Singapore: World Scientific, 2001.
174	MARCHAND B. Spacecraft formation keeping near the libration points of the sun–earth/moon system. Indiana: Purdue University, 2004.
175	MARCHAND B G, HOWELL K C. Formation flight near and in the sun–earth/moon ephemeris system including solar radiation pressure. Proc. of the AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, 2004: AAS 03-596.
176	FOLTA D, VAUGHN F. A survey of earth–moon libration orbits: stationkeeping strategies and intra–orbit transfers. Proc. of the AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit, 2004: 4741.
177	HAMILTON N, FOLTA D, CARPENTER R. Formation flying satellite control around the sun–earth libration point. Proc. of the AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit, 2002: 4528.
178	FOLTA D C, PAVLAK T A, HOWELL K C, et al. Stationkeeping of lissajous trajectories in the Earth–Moon system with applications to ARTEMIS. Proc. of the Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, 2010: AAS 10–113.
179	FOLTA D C, BOSANAC N, GUZZETTI D, et al. An earth–moon system trajectory design reference catalog. Acta Astronautica, 2015, 110: 341–353.
180	PAVLAK T A, HOWELL K C. Strategy for long–term libration point orbit stationkeeping in the Earth–Moon system. Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, 2011, 142: 1717–1734.
181	FOLTA D C, WOODARD M, HOWELL K, et al. Applications of multi–body dynamical environments: the ARTEMIS transfer trajectory design. Acta Astronautica, 2012, 73: 237–249.
182	SIBECK D G, ANGELOPOULOS V, BRAIN D A, et al. The ARTEMIS mission. New York: Springer, 2011.
183	HOWELL K C, FARQUHAR R W, BREAKWELL J. The restricted problem, and halo orbits. Acta Astronautica, 1993, 29(6): 485–488.
184	PRIETO T, GOMEZ G Stationkeeping at libration points of natural elongated bodies. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1994, 17 (4): 787- 794.
185	SCHEERES D J, HAN D, HOU Y. Influence of unstable manifolds on orbit uncertainty. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2001, 24(3): 573–585.
186	OZIMEK M T. Low–thrust trajectory design and optimization of lunar south pole coverage missions. Indiana: Purdue University, 2010.
187	DUNHAM D W, FARQUHAR R W. Libration point missions, 1978–2002. Singapore: World Scientific, 2003.
188	KOON W S, LO M W, MARSDEN J E, et al. Dynamical systems, the three–body problem and space mission design. Singapore: World Scientific, 2000.
189	GOMEZ G, JORBA A, SOLER J M, et al. Dynamics and mission design near libration points: advanced methods for collinear points. Singapore: World Scientific, 2001.
190	GOMEZ G, LO M W, ROSS S D, et al. Invariant manifolds, the spatial three–body problem and petit grand tour of jovian moons. https://authors.library.caltech.edu/20313/1/GoKoLoMaMaRo2003.pdf.
191	KOON W S, LO M W, MARSDEN J E, et al. Dynamical systems, the three–body problem and space mission design. Pasadena: California Institute of Technology, 2006.
192	OZIMEK M T, HOWELL K C. Low–thrust transfers in the Earth–Moon system, including applications to libration point orbits. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2010, 33(2): 533–549.
193	BARDEN B, HOWELL LO K M. Application of dynamical systems theory to trajectory design for a libration point mission. The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 1997, 45(2): 161–178.
194	TOPPUTO F, VASILE M, BERNELLI–ZAZZERA F. Low energy interplanetary transfers exploiting invariant manifolds of the restricted three–body problem. Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 2005, 53(4): 353–372.
195	PARKER J S, ANDERSON R L. Low–energy lunar trajectory design. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2014.
196	TOPPUTO F, ZHANG R Y. Approximation of invariant manifolds by cubic convolution interpolation. Proc. of the 25th AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, 2015: 283–291.
197	KOON W S, LO M W, MARSDEN J E, et al. Low energy transfer to the Moon. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 2001, 81(1/2): 63–73.
198	MINGOTTI G, SANCHEZ J P, MCINNES C. Low energy, low–thrust capture of near earth objects in the sun–earth and earth–moon restricted three–body systems. Proc. of the AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, 2014: 4301.
199	HOWELL K C, KAKOI M. Transfers between the Earth–Moon and Sun–Earth systems using manifolds and transit orbits. Acta Astronautica, 2006, 59(1/5): 367–380.
200	ZHENG Y, LI Q L, XU M, et al. An integrated simulation system for operating solar sail spacecraft. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 32(5): 1200–1211.
201	YUNPENG H U, KEBO L I, LIANG Y, et al. Review on strategies of space–based optical space situational awareness. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 32(5): 1152–1166.
202	LIU Q, LIU X, JIAN W U, et al. A fast computational method for the landing footprints of space–to–ground vehicles. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 31(5): 1062–1076.
203	LI J T, ZHANG S, LIU X L, et al. Multi–objective evolutionary optimization for geostationary orbit satellite mission planning. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 28(5): 934–945.
204	ZHAI G, ZHANG J R, ZHOU Z C. On–orbit target tracking and inspection by satellite formation. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2013, 24(6): 879–888.
205	ZHANG R Y, WEI C S, YIN Z Y. On–orbit target tracking and inspection by satellite formation adaptive quasi fixed–time orbit control around asteroid with performance guarantees. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 2020, 122(1): 89–107.
206	FARQUHAR R W, MUHONEN D, RICHARDSON D. Mission design for a halo orbiter of the Earth. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 1977, 14: 170–177.
207	RICHARDSON D L. Halo orbit formulation for the ISEE–3 mission. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1980, 3(6): 543–548.
208	RICHARDSON D L. Analytic construction of periodic orbits about the collinear points. Celestial Mechanics, 1980, 22(3): 241–253.
209	HOWELL C K. Three–dimensional, periodic halo orbits in the restricted three–body problem. California: Stanford University, 1983.
210	KAKOI M. Design of transfers from Earth–Moon / libration point orbits to a destination object. Indiana: Purdue University, 2015.
211	BOSANAC N. Leveraging natural dynamical structures to explore multi–body systems. Indiana: Purdue University, 2016.
212	BARDEN B T, HOWELL K C, LO M W. Application of dynamical systems theory to trajectory design for a libration point mission. Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 1996, 45(2): 161–178.
213	GALBO P L, BOUFFARD M. SOHO–a cooperative scientific mission to the sun. ESA Bulletin, 1992, 71: 21–25.
214	LANG K R. SOHO reveals the secrets of the Sun. Scientific American, 1997, 276 (3): 40–47.
215	CREDLAND J, FELICI F, GRENSEMANN M, et al. Three missions, three launches, six spacecraft for science in 1995. ESA Bulletin, 1995, 82: 36–47.
216	NASA. 3, 000th Comet spotted by solar and heliospheric observatory (soho). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_and_Heliospheric_Observatory#cite_ref–navy_2–0.
217	LUIGI C. Extended life for ESA’s science missions. http://sci.esa.int/director–desk/60943– extended–life–for–esas–science–missions/#1.
218	USA Today. Satellite to aid space weather forecasting. https://www.usatoday.com/weather/solar/wswx198.htm.
219	ZAZZERA F B, TOPPUTO F, MASSARI M. Assessment of mission design including utilization of libration points and weak stability boundaries. http://www.esa.int/gsp/ACT/doc/ARIADNA-RPT-03-4103-MilanoUni_InterplanetaryHighways-.pdf.
220	CHRISTIAN E R, DAVIS A J. Advanced composition explorer (ACE) mission overview. https://izw1.caltech.edu/ACE/ace_mission.html.
221	SPERGEL D N, VERDE L, PEIRIS H V, et al. First–year wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (WMAP)* observations: determination of cosmological parameters. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 2003, 148(1): 175–194.
222	SPERGEL D N, BEAN R, DORE O, et al. Three–year wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (WMAP) observations: implications for cosmology. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 2007, 170(2): 377–408.
223	WILLIAMS K, WILSON R, LO M, et al. Genesis halo orbit station keeping design. Spaceflight Dynamics. http://hdl.handle.net/2014/15031.
224	HECHLER M, COBOS J. Herschel, Planck and Gaia orbit design. http://www.ieec.cat/hosted/web–libpoint/presentacions/hechler.pdf.
225	HOUGHTON M B. Getting to the hard way: triana’s launch options. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20020081116/downloads /20020081116.pdf.
226	COLLABORATION T P. The Scientific programme of planck. https://arxiv.org/ftp/astro–ph/papers/0604/0604069.pdf.
227	DOYLE D, PILBRATT G, TAUBER J. The herschel and planck space telescopes. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2009, 97(8): 1403–1411.
228	BAUSKE R. Operational manoeuvre optimization for the ESA missions herschel and planck. https://www.issfd.org/ISSFD_2009/InterMissionDesignI /Bauske.pdf.
229	TAUBER J A, MANDOLESI N, PUGET J L, et al. Planck pre–launch status: the Planck mission. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 2010, 520(1): 852–861.
230	GRIFFIN M J, ABERGEL A, ABREU A, et al. The Herschel–SPIRE instrument and its in–flight performance. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 2017, 518(3): 383–416.
231	PILBRATT G L, RIEDINGER J R, PASSVOGEL T, et al. Herschel space observatory–an ESA facility for far–infrared and submillimetre astronomy. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 2010, 518(3): 383–416.
232	ROTHMAN L S, GORDON I E, BABIKOV Y, et al. The HITRAN2012 molecular spectroscopic database. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 2013, 130: 4–50.
233	ADE P A R, AGHANIM N, ALVES M I R, et al. Planck 2013 results. I. Overview of products and results. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_ht ml/2014/11/aa21529–13/aa21529–13.html.
234	LIU L, LIU Y, CAO J F, et al. CHANG’E–2 lunar escape maneuvers to the Sun–Earth libration point mission. Acta Astronautica, 2014, 93: 390–399.
235	ZHAO B C, YANG J F, WEN D S, et al. Overall scheme and on–orbit images of Chang’E–2 lunar satellite CCD stereo camera. Science China Technological Sciences, 2011, 54(9): 2237.
236	WU B, HU H, GUO J. Integration of Chang’E–2 imagery and LRO laser altimeter data with a combined block adjustment for precision lunar topographic modeling. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2014, 391: 1–15.
237	HUANG J C, JI J H, YE P J, et al. The ginger–shaped asteroid 4179 toutatis: new observations from a successful flyby of Chang’e–2. Scientific Reports, 2013, 3(1): 1–6.
238	PERRYMAN M A C, BOER K S, GILMORE G, et al. GAIA: composition, formation and evolution of the Galaxy. Astronomy & Astro–physics, 2001, 369(1): 339–363.
239	PRUSTI T, BRUIJNE J H J, BROWN A G A, et al. The gaia mission. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 2016, 595: A1.
240	BRUIJNE J H J. Science performance of Gaia, ESA’s space–astrometry mission. Astrophysics and Space Science, 2012, 341(1) : 31–41.
241	SOZZETTI A, CASERTANO S, LATTANZI M G, et al. Detection and measurement of planetary systems with GAIA. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 2001, 373(3): L21.
242	ESA. Mission operations: overview. http://sci.esa.int/lisa–pathfinder/31436–overview/.
243	RUDOLPH A. LISA pathfinder launch and early operations phase–in–orbit experience. Proc. of the 14th International Conference on Space Operations, 2016: 2412.
244	ROBERTS C, CASE S, REAGOSO J, et al. Early mission maneuver operations for the deep space climate observatory sun–earth libration point mission. Proc. of the AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, 2015: AAS 15–613.
245	BURT J, SMITH B. Deep space climate observatory: the DSCOVR mission. Proc. of the IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2012. DOI: 10.1109/AERO.2012.6187025.
246	ROBERTS C, CASE S, REAGOSO J. Lissajous orbit control for the deep space climate observatory sun–earth libration point mission. Proc. of the AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, 2015: AAS 15–611.
247	SWEETSER T H, BROSCHART S B, ANGELOPOULOS V, et al. ARTEMIS mission design. New York: Springer, 2012.
248	EOPANGELOPOULOS V. The ARTEMIS mission. http://www.igpp.ucla.edu/public/THEMIS/SCI/Pubs /artemis/The_ARTEMIS_Mission_SSR_accepted. pdf.
249	Science & Technology. Queqiao: the bridge between Earth and the far side of the moon. https://phys.org/news/2021–06–queqiao–bridge–earth–side–moon.html.
250	XU L. Chang’e 4 relay satellite, Queqiao: a bridge between Earth and the mysterious lunar farside. http://www. planetary.org/blogs/ guest–blogs/2018/0519–change–4–relay– satellite.html.
251	JONES A. Queqiao update: Chang’e–4 lunar relay satellite establishing halo orbit after approaching La–grange point.https://gbtimes.com/ queqiao– update–change–4–lunar–relay–satellite–establishing–halo–orbit–after–approaching–lagrange–point.
252	NASA. About the James Webb space telescope. https://jwst.nasa.gov/about.html.
253	NASA. Webb vs Hubble Telescope. https://jwst.nasa.gov/content/about/comparisonWebbVsHubble.html.
254	NASA. International x–ray observatory. https://asd.gsfc.nasa.gov/archive/ixo/.
255	KUNIEDA H, WHITE N, PARMAR A. Announcing: the international x–ray observatory (IXO), Goddard Space Flight Center. https://asd.gsfc.nasa.gov/archive/ixo/news/2008/ixo_announcement.html.
256	CARPENTER K G, SCHRIJVER C J, KAROVSKA M. The stellar imager (SI) project: a deep space UV/optical interferometer (UVOI) to observe the universe at 0.1 milli–arcsec angular resolution. Astrophysics and Space Science, 2009, 320(1–3): 217–223.
257	CHRISTENSEN–DALSGAARD J, CARPENTER K G, SCHRIJVER C J, et al. The stellar imager (SI)–a mission to resolve stellar surfaces, interiors, and magnetic activity. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 2011, 271(1): 012085.
258	CARPENTER K G, SCHRIJVER C J, KAROVSKA M. The stellar imager (SI) vision mission. Advances in Stellar Interferometry, 2006, 6268: 610–621.
259	CARPENTER K G, SCHRIJVER C J, LYON R G, et al. The stellar imager (SI) mission concept. Proc. of the International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2003: 293–303.
260	CHRISTOPHE B, ANDERSEN P H, ANDERSON J D, et al. Odyssey: a solar system mission. Experimental Astronomy, 2009, 23(2): 529–547.
261	FAVATA F. The Eddington baseline mission. Stellar Structure and Habitable Planet Finding, 2002, 485: 3–10.
262	HARRISON F A, CRAIG W W, CHRISTENSEN F E, et al. The nuclear spectroscopic telescope array (NuSTAR) high–energy X–ray mission. The Astrophysical Journal, 2013, 770(2): 103.
263	ESA. Darwin: study ended, no further activities planned. http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/ Space_Science/Darwin_overview.
264	MULLEN L. Rage against the dying of the light. https://www.astrobio.net/news–exclusive/rage–against–the–dying–of–the–light/.
265	LAWSON P R, DOOLEY J A. Technology plan for the terrestrial planet finder interferometer. California: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 2005.

Family	Around	Direction in RS	Direction in FS	Symmetric	Interpretation
a	L₃	Retrograde	Inexistence	x axis	Lyapunov, Halo
b	L₁	Retrograde	Inexistence	x axis	Lyapunov, Halo
c	L₂	Retrograde	Inexistence	x axis	Lyapunov, Halo
d	L₄	—	—	—	Inexistence for μ = 0.5
e	L₅	—	—	—	Inexistence for μ = 0.5
f	m₁	Retrograde	Direct	x axis	Earth orbit
g	m₁	Direct	Direct	x axis	Earth orbit
h	m₂	Retrograde	Direct	x axis	DRO
i	m₂	Direct	Direct	x axis	DPO
k	m₁,m₂	Direct	Direct	x axis	See [33]
l	m₁,m₂	Retrograde	Direct	x axis	See [33]
m	m₁,m₂	Retrograde	Retrograde	x axis	See [33]
n	—	Retrograde	—	Asymmetric	See [33]
o	—	Retrograde	—	Asymmetric	Asymptotic
r	—	Retrograde	—	y axis	Asymptotic

Reference title	Principal contributor	Year	General description	μ
n-body problem	Newton	1687	Solution to the n-body problem	Optional
Circular restricted	Euler	1772	Formulation	Optional
Three-body problem	Lagrange	1772	Equilibrium solutions	Optional
	Jacobi	1836	Jacobi constant	Optional
	Hill	1877–1878	Motion of the Moon	0
	Poincare	1892–1899	Existence of periodic orbit	Optional
Copenhagen category	Darwin	1897–1910	Families of periodic orbits	1/11
	Moulton	1900–1917		1/5,1/2
	Stromgren	1913–1939		1/2
Periodic lunar orbit	Egorov	1957	Families of periodic orbits	~0.012
	Newton	1958
	Broucke	1962
	Huang	1962
	Arenstorf	1963
Motion around the triangular	Rabe	1961	Families of periodic orbits	~0.000 95
Motion around the triangular	Rabe	1962	Families of periodic orbits	~0.012
Lagrangian points	Deprit	1965	—	—
Lunar trajectories	Egorov	1957	Families of special non-periodic orbits	~0.012
	Thüring	1959
	Buchheim	1959
	Ehriche	1962
	Szebehely	1964
	Pierce	1965
	Standish	1965
Application to binary systems	Kuiper	1941	Families of non-periodic orbits	0.1–0.5
	Kopal	1956
	Abhyankar	1959
	Gould	1959
Additional periodic orbits	Message	1959	2:1 commensurability	~0.00095
	Deprit	1965	asymptotic-periodic	several
	Szebehely	1965	1:3 commensurability	0.2–0.24
	Knowles	1959	—	—
Application to Earth- Moon systems	Farquhar	1968–2017	Families of	0–0.5
	Howell	1984–2017	halo (NRHO) orbits
	Restrepo	2017	and all planar group