Acquisition performance of B1I abounding with 5G signals

doi:10.23919/JSEE.2022.000024

Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3): 563-574.doi: 10.23919/JSEE.2022.000024

收稿日期:2020-08-22 接受日期:2022-02-11 出版日期:2022-06-18 发布日期:2022-06-24

Acquisition performance of B1I abounding with 5G signals

Peng SHANG^1,^2,³(), Xue WANG^4,*(), Decai ZOU^1,⁵(), Ziyue CHU^1,^2,³(), Yao GUO^1,^2,³()

¹ National Time Service Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi’an 710600, China
² University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 101408, China
³ Key Laboratory of Precision Navigation and Timing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi’an 710600, China
⁴ Institute of Information Sensing, Xidian University, Xi’an 710600, China
⁵ School of Astronomy and Space Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2020-08-22 Accepted:2022-02-11 Online:2022-06-18 Published:2022-06-24
Contact: Xue WANG E-mail:shangpeng19@mails.ucas.ac.cn;wangxue@ntsc.ac.cn;zoudecai@ntsc.ac.cn;chuziyue@ntsc.ac.cn;guoyao@ntsc.ac.cn
About author:|SHANG Peng was born in 1991. He received his M.S. degree in 2019 from the College of Electronic Information and Automation, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin. He is currently a Ph.D. candidate in the National Time Service Center. His research interests are compatibility assessment for intra and inter GNSS signals and intelligent signal processing for the identification of the communication transmitter. E-mail: shangpeng19@mails.ucas.ac.cn||WANG Xue was born in 1979. He received his Ph.D. degree in telecommunication technology from the National Time Service Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences in 2011. Now he is a researcher at the Institute of Information Sensing, Xidian University. His research interests are GNSS signal quality monitoring and evaluation, GNSS signal design and verification, GNSS reception technology and anti-jamming, and detection and identification for the space signal. E-mail: wangxue@ntsc.ac.cn||ZOU Decai was born in 1979. He received his M. S. and Ph.D. degrees in Telecommunication technology from the National Time Service Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, in 2006 and 2009, respectively. He is a researcher of the National Time Service Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences. His current research interests include the development theory of satellite navigation, cooperative localization in wireless ad hoc networks, indoor positioning, and high precision time transfer navigation. E-mail: zoudecai@ntsc.ac.cn||CHU Ziyue was born in 1996. He is currently an M.S. degree candidate at the National Time Service Center. His research interests are evaluation and feature extraction for the space signal. E-mail: chuziyue@ntsc.ac.cn||GUO Yao was born in 1992. She is currently a Ph.D. candidate at the National Time Service Center. Her research interests are GNSS signal baseband algorithm and signal quality evaluation. E-mail: guoyao@ntsc.ac.cn

摘要/Abstract

Abstract:

The widespread 5G base stations can be potential jammers for the vulnerable BeiDou B1I receivers due to its low power. Therefore, a novel analytical model is derived for the 5G signal to evaluate its impact on acquisition performance under three decision methods. The good agreement between the Monte Carlo method (MCM) through software defined receiver (SDR) and the derived expressions validates the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm. It can be found that the receivers exhibit varied responses for different 5G waveforms and decision strategies. The receiver also shows the least endurances for some kind of 5G waveforms, however, this kind of adverse effect can be cancelled by a reduced interference signal ratio (ISR), an increased integration time or a larger accumulation times.

Key words: 5G new radio (NR), coexistence evaluation, acquisition performance, software defined receiver (SDR)

. [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 33(3): 563-574.

Peng SHANG, Xue WANG, Decai ZOU, Ziyue CHU, Yao GUO. Acquisition performance of B1I abounding with 5G signals[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 33(3): 563-574.

图/表 19

参考文献 30

1	China Satellite Navigation Systems Management Office. BeiDou Navigation Satellite System Signal In Space Interface Control Document (V3.0). 2019. http://en.beidou.gov.cn/SYSTEMS/ICD/201902/P020190227702348791891.pdf
2	O'DRISCOLL C, RAO M, BORIO D, et al. Compatibility analysis between LightSquared signals and L1/E1 GNSS reception. Proc. of the IEEE Position Location & Navigation Symposium, 2012: 447−454.
3	WILDEMEERSCH M, RABBACHIN A, CANO E, et al. Interference assessment of DVB-T within the GPS L1 and Galileo E1 band. Proc. of the 5th ESA Workshop on Satellite Navigation Technologies and European Workshop on GNSS Signals and Signal Processing, 2010. DOI: 10.1109/NAVITEC.2010.5708046.
4	APILO O, HIIVALA M, KUOSMONEN A, et al. Measured GPS performance under LTE-M in-device interference. Proc. of the 9th ESA Workshop on Satellite Navigation Technologies and European Workshop on GNSS Signals and Signal Processing, 2018. DOI: 10.1109/NAVITEC.2018.8642666.
5	CHU H L, GAO Y, LU M Q Test and analysis of the compatibility of S-band GNSS signal and its adjacent band signals. Journal of Telemetry, Tracking and Command, 2018, 39 (3): 1- 7.
6	ZHANG H T Analysis on spectrum interference coordination in 5G NR systems. Mobile Communications, 2019, 43 (2): 38- 42.
7	CARFANO G, MURGUIA H, GUDEM P, et al. Impact of FR1 5G NR jammers on UWB indoor position location systems. Proc. of the International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation, 2019. DOI: 10.1109/IPIN.2019.8911756.
8	TERCERO M, SHARMA S, COLDREY M, et al. Coexistence between 5G and fixed services. Proc. of the IEEE 83rd Vehicular Technology Conference, 2016. DOI: 10.1109/VTCSpring.2016.7504168.
9	SON H K, CHONG Y J. Coexistence of 5G system with fixed satellite service Earth station in the 3.8 GHz band. Proc. of the International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence, 2018: 1070−1073.
10	KIM S, VISOTSKY E, MOORUT P, et al Coexistence of 5G with the incumbents in the 28 and 70 GHz bands. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2017, 35 (6): 1254- 1268. doi: 10.1109/JSAC.2017.2687238
11	WANG P, WANG Y Q, YU X L, et al Performance comparison of code discriminators in the presence of CW interference. Wireless Personal Communications, 2016, 89, 405- 426. doi: 10.1007/s11277-016-3272-2
12	DAI X Z, NIE J W, LI B Y, et al. Performance of GNSS receivers with AGC in noise pulse interference. Proc. of the 5th International Conference on Computer Science and Network Technology, 2016: 735−740.
13	BEK K M, SHANEEN M E, ELGAMEL S A Mathematical analyses of pulse interference signal on post-correlation carrier-to-noise ratio for the global positioning system receivers. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, 2015, 9 (3): 266- 275.
14	BEK K M, SHANEEN M E, ELGAMEL S A Classification and mathematical expression of different interference signals on a GPS receiver. Navigation: Journal of The Institute of Navigation, 2015, 62 (1): 23- 37.
15	ZHANG C, SHUI L, HUANG H, et al Research on the mechanism and the impact of jamming on BeiDou software receiver. Proc. of the IEEE Chinese Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, 2016, 198- 202.
16	JEONG S, SIN C S GNSS interference signal generation scenario for GNSS interference verification platform. Proc. of the 15th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems, 2015, 1363- 1365.
17	TS 38.104 V15.5.0. Technical specification group radio access network, base station (BS) radio transmission and reception. France: European Telecommunications Standards Institute, 2019.
18	WEN R H, LIU Z J, SHEN J M Compatibility analysis of the BDS and the 4G mobile communication system. Geomatics Science and Engineering, 2014, 34 (4): 65- 69.
19	ITU-R Report M.2142-0. Guidelines for evaluation of radio interference technologies for IMT-2020. Geneva: Electronic Publication, 2017.
20	STEPHEN M, HADI W, KAREN V D, et al. DOT GPS adjacent band compatibility assessment test results. Proc. of the International Technical Meeting of the Institute of Navigation, 2017: 637−661.
21	PARK J, LEE E, PARK S, et al Modeling and analysis on radio interference of OFDM waveforms for coexistence study. IEEE Access, 2019, 7, 35132- 35147.
22	LI Y F, SHIVARAMAIAH N C, AKOS D M. An open source BDS-3 B1C/B2a SDR receiver. Proc. of the ION ITM Institute of Navigation, 2018: 826–836.
23	LI Y F, SHIVARAMAIAH N C, AKOS D M Design and implementation of an open-source BDS-3 B1C/B2a SDR receiver. GPS Solutions, 2019, 23 (60): 1- 16.
24	XIE G. Principles of GPS and receiver design. Beijing: Electronics and Industry Press, 2008.
25	Mathworks. 5G Toolbox. https://www.mathworks.com/products/5g.html.
26	GEIGER B C, VOGEL C, SOUDAN M Comparison between ratio detection and threshold comparison for GNSS acquisition. IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2012, 48 (2): 1772- 1779.
27	SLUMP C H, QUEK T Q S, RABBACHIN A. GNSS signal acquisition in harsh urban environments. Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops, 2013: 62−67.
28	ZIEMER R E, PETERSON R L. Digital communications and spread spectrum systems. New York: Macmillan and Collie, 2008.
29	BORRE K, AKOS D M, BERTLSEN N, et al. A software-defined GPS and Galileo receiver: a single-frequency approach. New York: Springer, 2007.
30	BENACHENHOU K, HAMADOUCHE M, TALEB-AHMED A New formulation of GNSS acquisition with CFAR detection. International Journal of Satellite Communications and Networking, 2017, 35 (3): 215- 230. doi: 10.1002/sat.1177

Parameter	Wave
Parameter	1	2	3	4
SCS/KHz	15	15	30	30
Bandwidth/MHz	5	10	5	10
Modulation	16/64QAM

Acquisition performance of B1I abounding with 5G signals

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 19

参考文献 30

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

Path loss	Distance/m
Path loss	5	10	125	165
UMA/dB	54	60	90	96
RMA/dB	54	56	86	91

Decision ISR waveform	Wave
Decision ISR waveform	1	2	3	4
GLRT	26	28	25	26
GLRT ratio	26	28	25	26