A trajectory shaping guidance law with field-of-view angle constraint and terminal limits

doi:10.23919/JSEE.2022.000043

Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 426-437.doi: 10.23919/JSEE.2022.000043

收稿日期:2020-11-23 出版日期:2022-05-06 发布日期:2022-05-06

A trajectory shaping guidance law with field-of-view angle constraint and terminal limits

Shengnan FU¹(), Guanqun ZHOU^2,*(), Qunli XIA³()

¹ School of Mechatronical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
² Beijing Aerospace Technology Institute, Beijing 100074, China
³ School of Aerospace Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China

Received:2020-11-23 Online:2022-05-06 Published:2022-05-06
Contact: Guanqun ZHOU E-mail:3120160497@bit.edu.cn;zhougq5307@163.com;1010@bit.edu.cn
About author:|FU Shengnan was born in 1993. She received her B.E. degree from Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China, in 2014. She is currently a doctoral student in the School of Mechatronical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology. Her main research interests include ?ight vehicle design, guidance and control. E-mail: 3120160497@bit.edu.cn||ZHOU Guanqun was born in 1992. He received his B.E., M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the School of Aerospace Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China, in 2014, 2017 and 2020, respectively. He is currently working in Beijing Aerospace Technology Institute. His research interests include trajectory optimization, design of guidance laws and tracking controllers. E-mail: zhougq5307@163.com||XIA Qunli was born in 1971. He received his B.E. degree in launcher and design from Beijing Institute of Technology in 1993, and M.S. degree in flight mechanics from Beijing Institute of Technology in 1996. He received his Ph.D. degree in aircraft design from Beijing Institute of Technology in 1999. He is an adjunct professor in Beijing Institute of Technology. His research interests are control and guidance technology. E-mail: 1010@bit.edu.cn
Supported by:
This work was supported by the Defense Science and Technology Key Laboratory Fund of Luoyang Electro-Optical Equipment Institute, Aviation Industry Corporation of China (6142504200108).

摘要/Abstract

Abstract:

In this paper, a trajectory shaping guidance law, which considers constraints of ?eld-of-view (FOV) angle, impact angle, and terminal lateral acceleration, is proposed for a constant speed missile against a stationary target. First, to decouple constraints of the FOV angle and the terminal lateral acceleration, the third-order polynomial with respect to the line-of-sight (LOS) angle is introduced. Based on an analysis of the relationship between the looking angle and the guidance coefficient, the boundary of the coefficient that satisfies the FOV constraint is obtained. The terminal guidance law coefficient is used to guarantee the convergence of the terminal conditions. Furthermore, the proposed law can be implemented under bearings-only information, as the guidance command does not involve the relative range and the LOS angle rate. Finally, numerical simulations are performed based on a kinematic vehicle model to verify the effectiveness of the guidance law. Overall, the work offers an easily implementable guidance law with closed-form guidance gains, which is suitable for engineering applications.

Key words: shaping guidance law, field-of-view (FOV) constraint, impact angle constraint, terminal lateral acceleration constraint

. [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 33(2): 426-437.

Shengnan FU, Guanqun ZHOU, Qunli XIA. A trajectory shaping guidance law with field-of-view angle constraint and terminal limits[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 33(2): 426-437.

图/表 23

参考文献 30

1	WANG C Y, DONG W, WANG J N, et al Nonlinear suboptimal guidance law with impact angle constraint: an SDRE-based approach. IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2020, 56 (6): 4831- 4840. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2020.3003105
2	HU Q L, HAN T, XIN M Three-dimensional guidance for various target motions with terminal angle constraints using twisting control. IEEE Trans. on Industrial Electronics, 2020, 67 (2): 1242- 1253. doi: 10.1109/TIE.2019.2898607
3	XIN H B, CHEN Q Y, WANG Y J, et al Terminal guidance simulation and flight test for small UCAV. Proc. of the International Conference on Control, Automation and Diagnosis, 2019, 1431- 1441.
4	KIM H G, LEE J Y, KIM H J Look angle constrained impact angle control guidance law for homing missiles with bearings-only measurements. IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2018, 54 (6): 3096- 3107. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2018.2843600
5	LEE S, KIM Y Capturability of impact-angle control composite guidance law considering field-of-view limit. IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2020, 56 (2): 1077- 1093. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2019.2925485
6	DONG W, WEN Q Q, XIA Q L, et al Multiple-constraint cooperative guidance based on two-stage sequential convex programming. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2020, 33 (1): 296- 307. doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2019.07.026
7	KIM M, GRIDER K V Terminal guidance for impact attitude angle constrained flight trajectories. IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 1973, 9 (6): 852- 859. doi: 10.1109/TAES.1973.309659
8	RYOO C K, CHO H, TAHK M J Closed-form solutions of optimal guidance with terminal impact angle constraint. Proc. of the IEEE Conference on Control Applications, 2003, 504- 509.
9	RYOO C K, CHO H, TAHK M J Time-to-go weighted optimal guidance with impact angle constraints. IEEE Trans. on Control Systems Technology, 2006, 14 (3): 483- 492. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2006.872525
10	KIM K S, JUNG B, KIM Y Practical guidance law controlling impact angle. Proc. of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2007, 221 (1): 29- 36. doi: 10.1243/09544100JAERO115
11	KUMAR S R, RAO S, GHOSE D Sliding-mode guidance and control for all-aspect interceptors with terminal angle constraints. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 2012, 35 (4): 1230- 1246. doi: 10.2514/1.55242
12	OZA H, PADHI R. A nonlinear suboptimal guidance law with 3d impact angle constraints for ground targets. Proc. of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, 2015: 1–22. DOI: 10.2514/6.2010-8185.
13	ZARCHAN P. Tactical and strategic missile guidance. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2012.
14	LU P, DOMAN D B, SCHIERMAN J D Adaptive terminal guidance for hypervelocity impact in speciﬁed direction. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 2006, 29 (2): 269- 278. doi: 10.2514/1.14367
15	RATNOO A, GHOSE D Impact angle constrained interception of stationary targets. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 2012, 31 (6): 1816- 1821.
16	RATNOO A, GHOSE D Impact angle constrained interception of non-stationary non-maneuvering targets. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 2010, 33 (1): 269- 275. doi: 10.2514/1.45026
17	ERER K S, MERTTOPCUOGLU O Indirect impact-angle-control against stationary targets using biased pure proportional navigation. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 2012, 35 (2): 700- 704. doi: 10.2514/1.52105
18	ZHANG Y N, MA G X Guidance law with impact time and impact angle constraints. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2013, 16 (4): 960- 966.
19	ZHANG Y A, MA G X, WU H L A biased proportional navigation guidance law with large impact angle constraint and the time-to-go estimation. Proc. of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2014, 228 (G10): 1725- 1734.
20	KIM T H, PARK B G, TANK M J Bias-shaping method for biased proportional navigation with terminal-angle constraint. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 2013, 36 (6): 1810- 1816. doi: 10.2514/1.59252
21	ERER K S, TEKIN R, OZGOREN M K. Look angle constrained impact angle control based on proportional navigation. Proc. of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, 2013: 1–11. DOI: 10.2514/6.2015-0091.
22	TEKIN R, ERER K S Switched-gain guidance for impact angle control under physical constraints. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 2015, 38 (2): 205- 216. doi: 10.2514/1.G000766
23	PARK B G, KIM T H, TAHK M J Optimal impact angle control guidance law considering the seeker’s field-of-view limits. Proc. of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2012, 227 (8): 1347- 1364.
24	PARK B G, KIM T H, TAHK M J Range-to-go weighted optimal guidance with impact angle constraint and seeker’s look angle limits. IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2016, 52 (3): 1241- 1256. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2016.150415
25	RATNOO A Analysis of two-stage proportional navigation with heading constraints. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 2015, 39 (1): 1- 9.
26	JEON I S, LEE J I Impact-time-control guidance law with constraints on seeker look angle. IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2017, 53 (5): 2621- 2627. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2017.2698837
27	LIU B J, HOU M S, FENG D Nonlinear mapping based impact angle control guidance with seeker’s field-of-view constraint. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2019, 86 (3): 724- 736.
28	SHARMA Y R, RATNOO A A bearings-only trajectory shaping guidance law with look-angle constraint. IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2019, 55 (6): 3303- 3315. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2019.2906090
29	LI R, XIA Q L, WEN Q Q Extended optimal guidance law with impact angle and acceleration constriants. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2014, 25 (5): 868- 876. doi: 10.1109/JSEE.2014.00100
30	KEE P E, DONG L, SIONG C J. Near optimal midcourse guidance law for flight vehicle. Proc. of the AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 1998. DOI: 10.2514/6.1998-583.

A trajectory shaping guidance law with field-of-view angle constraint and terminal limits

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 23

参考文献 30

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价