1 |
HEINRICH H W. Industrial accident prevention: a scientific approach. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 1931, 4 (4): 609- 609.
|
2 |
PAKULA T. 'Domino' model of chain arrangement in bulk polymers. Polymer, 1987, 28 (8): 1293- 1297.
doi: 10.1016/0032-3861(87)90440-X
|
3 |
COZZANI V, GUBINELLI G, ANTONIONI G, et al. The assessment of risk caused by domino effect in quantitative area risk analysis. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2006, 127 (1-3): 14- 30.
|
4 |
KHAKZAD N. Application of dynamic Bayesian network to risk analysis of domino effects in chemical infrastructures. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2015, 138 (6): 263- 272.
|
5 |
REASON J, HOLLNAGEL E, PARIES J. Revisiting the "swiss cheese" model of accidents. Journal of Clinical Engineering, 2006, 27 (4): 110- 115.
|
6 |
HICKEY J, QI V E H. Effectiveness of accident models: system theoretic model vs. the Swiss cheese model: a case study of a US coast guard aviation mishap. International Journal of Risk Assessment & Management, 2013, 17 (1): 46- 68.
|
7 |
SURYOPUTRO M R, SARI A D, KURNIA R D. Preliminary study for modeling train accident in indonesia using swiss cheese model. Procedia Manufacturing, 2015, 3 (11): 3100- 3106.
|
8 |
HOLLNAGEL E, ÖRJAN G. The functional resonance accident model. Proc. of the International Symposium of the Australian Aviation Psychology Association, 2004: 155-161.
|
9 |
BELMONTE F, SCHÖN W, HEURLEY L, et al. Interdisciplinary safety analysis of complex socio-technological systems based on the functional resonance accident model: an application to railway traffic supervision. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2011, 96 (2): 237- 249.
|
10 |
CARVALHO P V R D. The use of functional resonance analysis method (FRAM) in a mid-air collision to understand some characteristics of the air traffic management system resilience. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2011, 96 (11): 1482- 1498.
|
11 |
YAO S. Applying system-theoretic accident model and processes (STAMP) to hazard analysis. Hamilton, Canada: Mcmaster University, 2012.
|
12 |
YUAN H. Network topology model and fault analysis for electrical control systems. London: Springer, 2012.
|
13 |
BUDDE S F. Modeling blowouts during drilling using STAMP and STPA. Trondheim, Norway: Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2012.
|
14 |
HOEL F. Modeling process leaks offshore using STAMP and STPA. Trondheim, Norway: Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2013.
|
15 |
YANG C. Software safety testing based on STPA. Procedia Engineering, 2014, 80 (9): 399- 406.
|
16 |
LU Y, ZHANG S G, TANG P, et al. STAMP-based safety control approach for flight testing of a low-cost unmanned subscale blended-wing-body demonstrator. Safety Science, 2015, 74 (4): 102- 113.
|
17 |
WILLIAMS A D. Beyond a series of security nets: applying STAMP & STPA to port security. Journal of Transportation Security, 2015, 8 (3/4): 139- 157.
|
18 |
ZHENG L, HU J B. Safety analysis of wheel brake system based on STAMP/STPA. http://www.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1929.V.20160606.1616.008.html. (in Chinese)
|
19 |
LEVESON N G. A new accident model for engineering safer systems. Safety Science, 2004, 42 (4): 237- 270.
doi: 10.1016/S0925-7535(03)00047-X
|
20 |
LEVESON N G. Engineering a safer world: systems thinking applied to safety. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2012.
|
21 |
THOMAS J. Extending and automating a systems-theoretic hazard analysis for requirements generation and analysis. Massachusetts, the United States: MIT, 2013.
|
22 |
FLEMING C H, LEVESON N G. Improving hazard analysis and certification of integrated modular avionics. Journal of Aerospace Information Systems, 2014, 11 (6): 397- 411.
doi: 10.2514/1.I010164
|
23 |
XIU Z X. System safety design & assessment in civil aircraft. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaotong University Press, 2013.
|
24 |
HU J B, ZHENG L. Functional control structure model for the complex systems and its application in system safety analysis. Journal of Measurements in Engineering, 2016, 4 (2): 70- 81.
|
25 |
VISSCHER I D, BRICTEUX L, WINCKELMANS G. Aircraft vortices in stably stratified and weakly turbulent atmospheres: simulation and modeling. AIAA Journal, 2015, 51 (3): 551- 566.
|
26 |
PRANDINI M, PIRODDI L, LYGEROS J. A two-step approach to aircraft conflict resolution combining optimal deterministic design with Monte Carlo stochastic optimization. Proc. of the IEEE Control Conference, 2015: 1824-1829.
|
27 |
ROMLI F, HARMIN M Y. Use of Monte Carlo method to estimate subsystem redesign risk for complex products: aircraft redesign case study. Aircraft Engineering & Aerospace Technology, 2015, 87 (6): 563- 570.
|
28 |
ZHANG J. Research on robust control allocation for the advanced configuration aircraft. Proc. of the 10th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, 2012: 1722-1726.
|
29 |
ROBERT C P, CASELLA G. Monte Carlo statistical methods. New York: Springer, 2004.
|
30 |
KUANG Q, HUANG Y M. The robustness verification of control law based on Monte Carlo method. Journal of System Simulation, 2009, (S): 351- 354.
|
31 |
SHAKARIAN A. Application of Monte Carlo techniques to the 757/767 autoland dispersion analysis by simulation. Proc. of the Guidance and Control Conference, 1983: 1-2.
|
32 |
ZENG X X. Modeling and simulation of aircraft brake system. Changsha, China: Central South University, 2008. (in Chinese)
|
33 |
CHENG H. Design and simulation of aircraft anti-skid brake system controller. Changsha, China: Central South University, 2014. (in Chinese)
|
34 |
LIU W S. Transient thermal field simulation of aircraft wheel. Materials Science and Engineering of Powder Metallurgy, 2015, 20 (2): 168- 174.
|